From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: "R. J. Wysocki" <rjwysocki@sisk.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Autotune swappiness01
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:17:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4104E863.6070102@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4104E750.60400@yahoo.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 781 bytes --]
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
>
>> R. J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday 26 of July 2004 12:29, Con Kolivas wrote:
>>>
>
>>>> I think one knob is one knob too many already.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please tell me why do you think so?
>>
>>
>>
>> If you wanna discuss pedantics...
>>
>> In my ideal, nonsensical, impossible to obtain world we have an
>> autoregulating operating system that doesn't need any knobs.
>>
>
> Some thinks are fundamental tradeoffs that can't be autotuned.
>
> Latency vs throughput comes up in a lot of places, eg. timeslices.
>
> Maximum throughput via effective use of swap, versus swapping as
> a last resort may be another.
As I said... it was ideal, nonsensical, and impossible. Doesn't sound
like you're arguing with me.
Con
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-26 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-26 0:25 [PATCH][2.6.8-rc1-mm1] Autotune swappiness01 Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 0:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 0:43 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 0:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 1:01 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 1:09 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 8:52 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 9:31 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:34 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 10:29 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:54 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 11:03 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:13 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 11:17 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-07-26 11:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 13:53 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 18:45 ` Adam Kropelin
2004-07-26 18:53 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 17:55 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-07-26 20:29 ` Joel Becker
2004-07-26 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 22:58 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27 0:52 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 1:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27 1:17 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 2:03 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27 2:43 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27 3:02 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27 3:43 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 3:47 ` Joel Becker
2004-07-27 15:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-27 3:41 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 14:52 Martin Knoblauch
2004-07-26 21:29 DaMouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4104E863.6070102@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rjwysocki@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.