From: Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp>
To: Tim Connors <tconnors+linuxkernel1090893567@astro.swin.edu.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
kernel@kolivas.org, Joel.Becker@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Autotune swappiness01
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:41:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4105CEDF.4040009@tequila.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrn-0.9.7.4-15175-21673-200407271159-tc@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tim Connors wrote:
| Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp> said on Tue, 27 Jul 2004
10:17:16 +0900:
| Depends on what you do. Do you compile kernels regularly? In
| particular, do you have to wait for them, or do you just let them sit
| in the background, and come back to them when you rememeber, since
| you've been busy doing real work for the past 5 hours? If you wait,
| then I guess you want high swapiness.
well this is a work box. I do coding, yes, but this is perl, php, etc,
mostly (99%) on remote machines. The big apps running here is mozilla,
openoffice, korganzier (yes I do the KDE bloat) and _a_ _lot_ of konsole
~ (kde terminals).
I want responsivness. I don't want to wait 10s to switch between virtual
desktops. I compile a kernel once in a while. Very rare actually,
because this is a work box and I don't reboot all the time (can't &
don't want). The last kernel change was 64d ago.
| For the rest of us who don't have to regularly read in hundreds of
| megs of disk, and don't need to use that hundreds of megs of disk over
| and over and over again (As far as I can see, this is just about
| everyone who's not a kernel developer or some big app developer[1]), I
| guess we get by just fine having smaller swapiness.
well the only thing that needs disk over and over again is this _crappy_
gentoo because it needs to compile everything. I really hate myself for
using it, because _this_ probably screws up _all_ the page cache, etc.
| [1] Maybe kde is bloated enough that you if want to start the equiv of
| an xterm all the time, maybe caching helps a lot there, but I make a
| point of using lean apps[2].
well, to be honest, I doubt it is so bloated anymore. I think gnome is
the better bloat of those two.
| [2] Sad when you consider xemacs lean, isn't it? ;)
well, if you call xemacs (the editor without an OS) lean ... *hmm* but I
am a vim man after all ;)
- --
Clemens Schwaighofer - IT Engineer & System Administration
==========================================================
TEQUILA\Japan, 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8167, JAPAN
Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343
http://www.tequila.co.jp
==========================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBBc7ejBz/yQjBxz8RAqYwAJoDCBWOxMRXAHHVelV+M9ObQjpsYQCg6a8n
GIRF1+LjDZ+U4TCovnk+RcA=
=K1Xc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-26 0:25 [PATCH][2.6.8-rc1-mm1] Autotune swappiness01 Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 0:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 0:43 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 0:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 1:01 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 1:09 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 8:52 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 9:31 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:34 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 10:29 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:54 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 11:03 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:13 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 11:17 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 13:53 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 18:45 ` Adam Kropelin
2004-07-26 18:53 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 17:55 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-07-26 20:29 ` Joel Becker
2004-07-26 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 22:58 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27 0:52 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 1:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27 1:17 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 2:03 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27 2:43 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27 3:02 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27 3:43 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 3:47 ` Joel Becker
2004-07-27 15:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-27 3:41 ` Clemens Schwaighofer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 14:52 Martin Knoblauch
2004-07-26 21:29 DaMouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4105CEDF.4040009@tequila.co.jp \
--to=cs@tequila.co.jp \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tconnors+linuxkernel1090893567@astro.swin.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.