Re: [Valgrind-users] Re: [uml-devel] Re: UML and valgrind

["D. Bahi" <dbahi@enterasys.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 879 bytes --]

ok, great.

now where do i put this snippet - because it doesn't
belong in the file mentioned in the earliest post...
(or if it does - i don't see how). is there someone
willing to 'modernize' this patch for the clueless
user (me ;)

thanks very much.

Nicholas Nethercote wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Jeff Dike wrote:
> 
>> It feels to me more like the valgrind thread runs a system call with no
>> perceptible effect, and there's this new thread all of a sudden which 
>> runs
>> happily in this address space because it can't tell that valgrind is 
>> there.
> 
> 
> To summarise:  you seem to be confident there won't be any problems, and 
> Tom's not so sure.  I'm not sure either, but the 
> threads/signals/syscalls stuff is the part of Valgrind I understand the 
> least.  I would say, just don't be shocked if you do this and weird 
> things start happening :)
> 
> N


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 187 bytes --]