* problem in mounting reiserfs
@ 2004-08-05 10:08 Avinesh Kumar
2004-08-05 11:06 ` Christian Mayrhuber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Avinesh Kumar @ 2004-08-05 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
hi,
i got error while mounting a partition of reiserfs. i am using linux
kernel-2.6.7 ..here is what i did as root ....
~ $ /usr/local/sbin/mkreiserfs -b 8192 /dev/hda6
mkreiserfs 3.6.17 (2003 www.namesys.com)
A pair of credits:
Joshua Macdonald wrote the first draft of the transaction manager. Yuri
Rupasov
did testing and benchmarking, plus he invented the r5 hash (also used
by the
dcache code). Yura Rupasov, Anatoly Pinchuk, Igor Krasheninnikov,
Grigory
Zaigralin, Mikhail Gilula, Igor Zagorovsky, Roman Pozlevich,
Konstantin
Shvachko, and Joshua MacDonald are former contributors to the project.
Chris Mason wrote the journaling code for V3, which was enormously more
useful
to users than just waiting until we could create a wandering log
filesystem as
Hans would have unwisely done without him.
Jeff Mahoney optimized the bitmap scanning code for V3, and performed
the big
endian cleanups.
Guessing about desired format.. Kernel 2.6.7-at1 is running.
Format 3.6 with standard journal
Count of blocks on the device: 525120
Number of blocks consumed by mkreiserfs formatting process: 8212
Blocksize: 8192
Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
Journal Size 8193 blocks (first block 10)
Journal Max transaction length 1024
inode generation number: 0
UUID: a7d5aa87-9471-432b-ad8f-ef6a426d626d
ATTENTION: YOU SHOULD REBOOT AFTER FDISK!
ALL DATA WILL BE LOST ON '/dev/hda6'!
Continue (y/n):y
Initializing journal - 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100%
Syncing..ok
Tell your friends to use a kernel based on 2.4.18 or later, and
especially not a
kernel based on 2.4.9, when you use reiserFS. Have fun.
ReiserFS is successfully created on /dev/hda6.
~ $ mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda6 /rfs
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda6,
or too many mounted file systems
~ $
but the same steps worked when i chose block size of 4096
bytes. please, help me out.
--
regards
avinesh
====================================
EVEN IMPOSSIBLE SAYS -- I M POSSIBLE
====================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: problem in mounting reiserfs
2004-08-05 10:08 problem in mounting reiserfs Avinesh Kumar
@ 2004-08-05 11:06 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-08-06 10:07 ` Avinesh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian Mayrhuber @ 2004-08-05 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:08, Avinesh Kumar wrote:
> ReiserFS is successfully created on /dev/hda6.
> ~ $ mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda6 /rfs
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda6,
> or too many mounted file systems
> ~ $
>
> but the same steps worked when i chose block size of 4096
> bytes. please, help me out.
If I remember right Reiserfs cannot use blocksize != page size and page size
is 4096 @ x86.
The only way to use reiserfs is with its default blocksize of 4096.
--
lg, Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: problem in mounting reiserfs
2004-08-05 11:06 ` Christian Mayrhuber
@ 2004-08-06 10:07 ` Avinesh Kumar
2004-08-06 10:21 ` Edward Shishkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Avinesh Kumar @ 2004-08-06 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
but that's not true ... i tried with block sizes 512 bytes, 1024 bytes
and is working just fine.
is anyone who can shed some bright light on this topic ?
Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
>On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:08, Avinesh Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
>>ReiserFS is successfully created on /dev/hda6.
>>~ $ mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda6 /rfs
>>mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda6,
>> or too many mounted file systems
>>~ $
>>
>> but the same steps worked when i chose block size of 4096
>>bytes. please, help me out.
>>
>>
>
>If I remember right Reiserfs cannot use blocksize != page size and page size
>is 4096 @ x86.
>The only way to use reiserfs is with its default blocksize of 4096.
>
>
>
--
regards
avinesh
====================================
EVEN IMPOSSIBLE SAYS -- I M POSSIBLE
====================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: problem in mounting reiserfs
2004-08-06 10:07 ` Avinesh Kumar
@ 2004-08-06 10:21 ` Edward Shishkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Edward Shishkin @ 2004-08-06 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avinesh Kumar; +Cc: reiserfs-list
Avinesh Kumar wrote:
> but that's not true ... i tried with block sizes 512 bytes, 1024 bytes
> and is working just fine.
> is anyone who can shed some bright light on this topic ?
Kernel checks if blocksize is from {512, 1024, ..., PAGE_SIZE}
Edward.
>
>
> Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 05 August 2004 12:08, Avinesh Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> ReiserFS is successfully created on /dev/hda6.
>>> ~ $ mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda6 /rfs
>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda6,
>>> or too many mounted file systems
>>> ~ $
>>>
>>> but the same steps worked when i chose block size of 4096
>>> bytes. please, help me out.
>>>
>>
>>
>> If I remember right Reiserfs cannot use blocksize != page size and
>> page size is 4096 @ x86.
>> The only way to use reiserfs is with its default blocksize of 4096.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-06 10:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-05 10:08 problem in mounting reiserfs Avinesh Kumar
2004-08-05 11:06 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-08-06 10:07 ` Avinesh Kumar
2004-08-06 10:21 ` Edward Shishkin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.