From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Sonny Rao <sonny@burdell.org>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Odd Block allocation behavior on Reiser3
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:52:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41190B5A.7070503@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040810154514.GA67591@kevlar.burdell.org>
Sonny Rao wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:16:39AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>Interesting.What happens without overwrite, that is, if you write more
>>files without deleting the old ones?
>>
>>
>
>Below I made 24 one gigabyte files in sequence
>All of them are similarly fragmented:
>
>x44016way1:/mnt/tmp0/data # ls -lh
>total 25G
>drwx------ 2 root root 816 Aug 10 10:05 .
>drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 96 Aug 10 10:00 ..
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:00 datafile0
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:00 datafile1
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:02 datafile10
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:02 datafile11
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:03 datafile12
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:03 datafile13
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:03 datafile14
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:03 datafile15
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:03 datafile16
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:04 datafile17
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:04 datafile18
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:04 datafile19
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:01 datafile2
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:04 datafile20
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:04 datafile21
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:05 datafile22
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:05 datafile23
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:01 datafile3
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:01 datafile4
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:01 datafile5
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:01 datafile6
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:02 datafile7
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:02 datafile8
>-rwx------ 1 root root 1.0G Aug 10 10:02 datafile9
>
>x44016way1:/mnt/tmp0/data # filefrag *
>datafile0: 268 extents found
>datafile1: 268 extents found
>datafile10: 267 extents found
>datafile11: 268 extents found
>datafile12: 268 extents found
>datafile13: 268 extents found
>datafile14: 268 extents found
>datafile15: 268 extents found
>datafile16: 268 extents found
>datafile17: 268 extents found
>datafile18: 267 extents found
>datafile19: 268 extents found
>datafile2: 267 extents found
>datafile20: 268 extents found
>datafile21: 268 extents found
>datafile22: 268 extents found
>datafile23: 267 extents found
>datafile3: 268 extents found
>datafile4: 268 extents found
>datafile5: 268 extents found
>datafile6: 268 extents found
>datafile7: 267 extents found
>datafile8: 268 extents found
>datafile9: 268 extents found
>
>
>
>
>
this could explain some reiser3 performance problems. This is what
happens when I spend all my time chasing funding and don't spend it
reviewing code and benchmarks, sigh.
Thanks for spotting this. I would be curious if this is occuring near
the transition between unformatted nodes and their parents, or something
else.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-10 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-09 20:19 Odd Block allocation behavior on Reiser3 Sonny Rao
2004-08-09 20:30 ` Chris Mason
2004-08-09 22:04 ` Sonny Rao
2004-08-10 7:16 ` Hans Reiser
2004-08-10 15:45 ` Sonny Rao
2004-08-10 17:52 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-08-10 18:25 ` Chris Mason
2004-08-10 18:50 ` Chris Mason
2004-08-10 19:42 ` Hans Reiser
2004-08-10 20:29 ` Chris Mason
2004-08-10 21:47 ` Hans Reiser
2004-08-10 23:12 ` Sonny Rao
2004-08-11 1:31 ` Jeff Mahoney
2004-08-10 19:40 ` Hans Reiser
2004-08-10 23:00 ` Sonny Rao
2004-08-10 20:12 ` Why larger extent counts aren't necessarily bad (was Re: Odd Block allocation behavior on Reiser3) Jeff Mahoney
2004-09-09 17:04 ` Hans Reiser
2004-08-10 12:53 ` Odd Block allocation behavior on Reiser3 Chris Mason
2004-08-10 16:12 ` Sonny Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41190B5A.7070503@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=sonny@burdell.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.