From: Brad Campbell <brad@wasp.net.au>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: libata dev_config call order wrong.
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:38:01 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41333BC9.1050903@wasp.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093872174.30146.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2004-08-30 at 10:12, Brad Campbell wrote:
>
>>Given that the SATA->PATA bridge boards support 80 pin detection, then bit 13 of word 93 must be
>>high on any drive that supports lba48, and given the *current* sata spec states that word 93 must be
>>zero, we should be able to use this detection method.
>
>
> Word 53 is the important one and essentially tells you what else to
> believe later on in the configuration.
Ok, well acording to my copy of the ATA-6 spec, word 53 mentions nothing about word 93. From
everything I have read in ATA-5 -> ATA-7 (Draft) word 93 appears to be pretty fixed.
It certainly works with my limited test set (all WD unfortunately)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-29 17:09 libata dev_config call order wrong Brad Campbell
2004-08-29 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 17:47 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-29 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 18:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-29 18:59 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-30 9:12 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 13:22 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-30 14:38 ` Brad Campbell [this message]
2004-08-30 14:42 ` [PATCH] libata ATA vs SATA detection and workaround Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 14:57 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 14:57 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 16:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-30 16:34 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 16:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-30 17:17 ` Brad Campbell
2004-08-30 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-31 7:47 ` Brad Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41333BC9.1050903@wasp.net.au \
--to=brad@wasp.net.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.