* Redhat 9 tcpmounting
2004-08-29 7:29 server local.flanders not responding, still trying on console randy
@ 2004-08-29 7:34 ` randy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: randy @ 2004-08-29 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Hello
Does anyone know if rh9 supports tcp mounting
When I try I get the error
nfs server reported service unavailable: Address already in use
my servers
cat /etc/exports
/home/un/ 192.168.0.214(insecure,rw)
/home/unt nfs.krusty(insecure,rw)
/home/und nfs.krusty(insecure,rw)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: Redhat 9 tcpmounting
[not found] <7E0DB3A126BA9146AC30744E2B7E4245111946@midhouhqxch01.net.smith.com>
@ 2004-08-30 12:53 ` randy
2004-08-30 17:23 ` Steve Dickson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: randy @ 2004-08-30 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Does anyone know the option I would have to enable in the config when
building the kernel?
Also is there a enough performance gain to warrant recompiling the kernel?
Thanks for you help
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Allan [mailto:anelson@miswaco.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 11:10 AM
To: randy
Subject: RE: [NFS] Redhat 9 tcpmounting
Yes, but you need to recompile the kernel to get support for it.
Allan
-----Original Message-----
From: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of randy
Sent: Sun 8/29/2004 2:34 AM
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Subject: [NFS] Redhat 9 tcpmounting
Hello
Does anyone know if rh9 supports tcp mounting
When I try I get the error
nfs server reported service unavailable: Address already in use
my servers
cat /etc/exports
/home/un/ 192.168.0.214(insecure,rw)
/home/unt nfs.krusty(insecure,rw)
/home/und nfs.krusty(insecure,rw)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
____________________________________________________________________________
__
This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
Copying, forwarding or distributing this message by persons or entities
other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this email in
error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from
any computer. This email may have been monitored for policy compliance.
[021216]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Redhat 9 tcpmounting
2004-08-30 12:53 ` Redhat 9 tcpmounting randy
@ 2004-08-30 17:23 ` Steve Dickson
2004-08-30 17:38 ` randy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Dickson @ 2004-08-30 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: randy; +Cc: nfs
randy wrote:
>Does anyone know the option I would have to enable in the config when
>building the kernel?
>
>
CONFIG_NFSD_TCP=y but buyer beware.... FC1 will do this much better
plus its configured in by default....
>Also is there a enough performance gain to warrant recompiling the kernel?
>
>
Well it depends on how clean your networks is. If you're getting a bunch
of retransmits
using UDP, then TCP should smooth things out (since TCP is much better
at dealing
with retransmits that RPC over UDP), but if the traffic is already
pretty smooth, then
performance may decrease a very small amount due to the TCP overhead.....
But the gains of using a smarter transport (i.e. TCP) outweighs the very
small performance hit... imho...
SteveD.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: Redhat 9 tcpmounting
2004-08-30 17:23 ` Steve Dickson
@ 2004-08-30 17:38 ` randy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: randy @ 2004-08-30 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs
Thanks for the response
What is "FC1"
I am connect between two boxes with a crossover and gigabit nic cards
I a, trying to figure out ways to get rid of this error message on my
console about a host not responding.
I was thinking maybe tcp would help
randy
-----Original Message-----
From: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Steve Dickson
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 12:23 PM
To: randy
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NFS] Redhat 9 tcpmounting
randy wrote:
>Does anyone know the option I would have to enable in the config when
>building the kernel?
>
>
CONFIG_NFSD_TCP=y but buyer beware.... FC1 will do this much better plus its
configured in by default....
>Also is there a enough performance gain to warrant recompiling the kernel?
>
>
Well it depends on how clean your networks is. If you're getting a bunch of
retransmits using UDP, then TCP should smooth things out (since TCP is much
better at dealing with retransmits that RPC over UDP), but if the traffic is
already pretty smooth, then performance may decrease a very small amount due
to the TCP overhead.....
But the gains of using a smarter transport (i.e. TCP) outweighs the very
small performance hit... imho...
SteveD.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise
J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-30 17:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <7E0DB3A126BA9146AC30744E2B7E4245111946@midhouhqxch01.net.smith.com>
2004-08-30 12:53 ` Redhat 9 tcpmounting randy
2004-08-30 17:23 ` Steve Dickson
2004-08-30 17:38 ` randy
2004-08-29 7:29 server local.flanders not responding, still trying on console randy
2004-08-29 7:34 ` Redhat 9 tcpmounting randy
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.