From: Otto Wyss <otto.wyss@orpatec.ch>
To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: framebuffer ioctl
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:58:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <413DDA94.F9F61839@orpatec.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9e4733910409070738a46cafb@mail.gmail.com
Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> That's what the numbers compare. I think he wants me to compare it to
> his new render implementation that uses the 3D hardware. But that's
> what I'm against. I don't want to see even more drivers trying to take
> control of the 3D hardware and causing even more conflicts.
> Implementing X on GL completely removes the need for expanding XAA to
> include using the 3D hardware. This pratice of ten different groups
> programming the video hardware however they want has got to stop or
> Linux is never going to be competitive with Mac/Longhorn.
>
What me concern here is there is a little too much talk about X.
Enhancing the framebuffer has nothing to do with X, it has to do with
providing a common set of functionality for _all_ the graphic libraries
however many there are and X is _just_ one of them.
Please correct me if I miss understood your intention.
O. Wyss
--
See a huge pile of work at "http://wyodesktop.sourceforge.net/"
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-07 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-04 11:04 framebuffer ioctl (fwd) Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-04 21:44 ` Otto Wyss
2004-09-05 17:13 ` framebuffer ioctl Zack
2004-09-06 1:33 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-09-06 15:36 ` Otto Wyss
2004-09-06 21:21 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-09-06 21:58 ` Zack
2004-09-06 23:05 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-09-06 19:56 ` Zack
2004-09-06 21:02 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-06 21:11 ` [OT] " Otto Solares
2004-09-06 21:39 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-07 0:01 ` Otto Solares
2004-09-07 0:11 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-06 21:24 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-09-07 14:17 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-07 14:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-07 14:38 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-07 15:58 ` Otto Wyss [this message]
2004-09-07 14:45 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-07 15:52 ` Michel Dänzer
2004-09-08 5:43 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-08 13:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2004-09-08 22:47 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-13 15:54 ` vga softboot code repository Richard Smith
2004-09-13 16:00 ` vga softboot code repository oops Richard Smith
2004-09-13 16:06 ` vga softboot code repository Jon Smirl
2004-09-06 18:43 ` framebuffer ioctl Otto Solares
2004-09-06 19:08 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-06 19:24 ` Otto Solares
2004-09-06 19:33 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-07 15:48 ` Otto Wyss
2004-09-07 16:01 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-07 18:09 ` Otto Solares
2004-09-06 19:33 ` Jon Smirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=413DDA94.F9F61839@orpatec.ch \
--to=otto.wyss@orpatec.ch \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.