* __stq_u parameter
@ 2004-09-23 15:24 Pavel Kiryukhin
2004-09-23 20:59 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Kiryukhin @ 2004-09-23 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: Pavel Kiryukhin
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 78 bytes --]
Sorry,
does this make sense for 2.4.x kernels?
----
Regards,
Pavel Kiryukhin
[-- Attachment #2: unaligned.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]
--- linux/include/asm-mips/unaligned.h_org 2004-09-23 15:54:37.000000000 +0400
+++ linux/include/asm-mips/unaligned.h 2004-09-23 18:32:48.000000000 +0400
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
/*
* Store doubleword ununaligned.
*/
-static inline void __stq_u(unsigned long __val, unsigned long long * __addr)
+static inline void __stq_u(unsigned long long __val, unsigned long long * __addr)
{
__asm__("usw\t%1, %0\n\t"
"usw\t%D1, 4+%0"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: __stq_u parameter 2004-09-23 15:24 __stq_u parameter Pavel Kiryukhin @ 2004-09-23 20:59 ` Ralf Baechle 2004-09-24 14:19 ` __stq_u parameter (and related XFS filesystem 1.3 & 1.3.1 problems on 2.4.x) Pavel Kiryukhin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Ralf Baechle @ 2004-09-23 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Kiryukhin; +Cc: linux-mips On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:24:47PM +0400, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote: > Sorry, > does this make sense for 2.4.x kernels? Once uppon a time it made ... The file has been rewritten completly since then. Thanks anyway, Ralf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: __stq_u parameter (and related XFS filesystem 1.3 & 1.3.1 problems on 2.4.x) 2004-09-23 20:59 ` Ralf Baechle @ 2004-09-24 14:19 ` Pavel Kiryukhin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Pavel Kiryukhin @ 2004-09-24 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mips; +Cc: Ralf Baechle, Pavel Kiryukhin [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 463 bytes --] Just in case it may help somebody.. This patch is necessary for normal 1.3 and 1.3.1 XFS filesystem operations on mips targets (LE especially) with old (2.4) kernels. ---- Pavel Ralf Baechle wrote: >On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:24:47PM +0400, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote: > > > >>Sorry, >>does this make sense for 2.4.x kernels? >> >> > >Once uppon a time it made ... > >The file has been rewritten completly since then. > >Thanks anyway, > > Ralf > > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 917 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-24 14:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-09-23 15:24 __stq_u parameter Pavel Kiryukhin 2004-09-23 20:59 ` Ralf Baechle 2004-09-24 14:19 ` __stq_u parameter (and related XFS filesystem 1.3 & 1.3.1 problems on 2.4.x) Pavel Kiryukhin
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.