[ADMIN] netfilter.org CVS now converted to subversion

[ADMIN] netfilter.org CVS now converted to subversion

[Harald Welte]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1599 bytes --]

Important Announcement!

The netfilter.org CVS server (pserver.netfilter.org) has been deprecated
by the new subversion repository at svn.netfilter.org.  More information
about the subversion revision control system can be found at
http://subversion.tigris.org/.

Everybody has read-only access to the new subversion tree using either
svn+http or svn+https. We do not provide the native svn protocol.

The respective URL's for the root of the tree are:

	https://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter
	http://svn.netfilter.org/netfilter

The CVSweb/ViewCVS interface at http://cvs.netfilter.org/ now points to
the subversion tree, as does the http://svn.netfilter.org/ URL.

The old CVS tree will be available for 30 days, so people can still
create patches from their changes by using 'cvs diff'.  Startin from
November 7, 2004 the CVS pserver service will be deactivated.

The CVS changelog mailinglist and the snapshot scripts for providing
iptables and patch-o-matic snapshots have not yet been converted to
subversion.  They are expected to come back until Sunday, 10 Oct 2004.

In case you experience any problems, feel free to contact me.

Happy Hacking,
	Harald Welte, for the Netfilter Core Team.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [ADMIN] netfilter.org CVS now converted to subversion

[Henrik Nordstrom]

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Harald Welte wrote:

> The old CVS tree will be available for 30 days, so people can still
> create patches from their changes by using 'cvs diff'.  Startin from
> November 7, 2004 the CVS pserver service will be deactivated.

is it only me, or have the cvs pserver been shut down already?

Regards
Henrik

Re: [ADMIN] netfilter.org CVS now converted to subversion

[Harald Welte]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 941 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 01:25:01AM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Harald Welte wrote:
> 
> >The old CVS tree will be available for 30 days, so people can still
> >create patches from their changes by using 'cvs diff'.  Startin from
> >November 7, 2004 the CVS pserver service will be deactivated.
> 
> is it only me, or have the cvs pserver been shut down already?

mh, I changed the config but didn't ask xinetd to reload... somehow it
apparently reloaded the config earlier today :(

it's running again now.

> Regards
> Henrik

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

having more then 1 external interfaces ?

[Faisal]

is it possible in iptables to have more then 1 external interfaces ?

Re: having more then 1 external interfaces ?

[Aleksandar Milivojevic]

Faisal wrote:
> is it possible in iptables to have more then 1 external interfaces ?

Short answer.  Yes.

Longer answer.  Netfilter do not have notition of external or internal 
interface.  They are all the same.  You build firewall rules according 
to which interfaces you consider as internal, external, and what kind of 
traffic are you going to allow on them.  If you want, you might be just 
as restrictive on internal interfaces as on external.

If you are using some software that generates firewall rules for you, 
than that software might have limitation of allowing you to tag only one 
interface as external.  Again, this is not limitation imposed by 
Netfilter.  For Netfilter, there's no such thing as internal or external 
interface.  Netfilter knows only about "interfaces", it doesn't know 
what you consider them to be.

-- 
Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>    Pollard Banknote Limited
Systems Administrator                           1499 Buffalo Place
Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276                     Winnipeg, MB  R3T 1L7

Re: having more then 1 external interfaces ?

[Jose Maria Lopez]

El lun, 18 de 10 de 2004 a las 03:07, Faisal escribió:
> is it possible in iptables to have more then 1 external interfaces ?

Of course, you can have any interfaces.

-- 
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA

The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
                -- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"