* The case of the disappearing CPU_FTR_xxx
@ 2004-11-09 8:47 Pantelis Antoniou
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pantelis Antoniou @ 2004-11-09 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini, linux-ppc-embedded
Hi all
I'm currently trying to implement proper idling for 8xx in 2.4 (please
don't bitch yet
since things are pretty similar for 2.6 too).
It appears that the flags set in cputable.c, i.e. CPU_FTR_NAP get cleared
at some point in the init sequence.
Looking at the 6xx idle code, there is some extra handling for that case but
I'm unable to locate what is going on.
Can anyone shed some light on the issue?
Regards
Pantelis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-11-09 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-09 8:47 The case of the disappearing CPU_FTR_xxx Pantelis Antoniou
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.