From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: rgb@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zohar@linux.ibm.com,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] integrity: Add result field in audit message
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:43:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41911815.FMGa2a4QOz@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhTmShh8ggdjLKf_ciL6fDt3ZH59BXaXMAgd8LFzqVj6rQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, June 15, 2020 6:51:22 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:26 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
>
> <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > Result code is not included in the audit messages logged by
> > the integrity subsystem. Add "result" field in the audit messages
> > logged by the integrity subsystem and set the value to the result code
> > passed to integrity_audit_msg() in the "result" parameter.
> >
> > Sample audit message:
> >
> > [ 6.284329] audit: type=1804 audit(1591756723.627:2): pid=1 uid=0
> > auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=kernel op=add_boot_aggregate
> > cause=alloc_entry comm="swapper/0" name="boot_aggregate" res=0
> > result=-12
> >
> > [ 8.085456] audit: type=1802 audit(1592005947.297:9): pid=1 uid=0
> > auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
> > op=policy_update cause=completed comm="systemd" res=1 result=0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
> > Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > security/integrity/integrity_audit.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> If we can't use "res=" to carry more than 0/1 then this seems reasonable.
Paul,
But we can't do this. The field name dictionary says this is used to convey
success/fail. It is hard coded in the field interpretation table to look for
0/1 and interpret that. Interpeting this field will now produce an error
message. And "result" is a searchable field.
As I suggested a few emails back, let's just use errno or something not
already taken in the dictionary. NACK.
-Steve
> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
>
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > b/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c index 5109173839cc..84002d3d5a95
> > 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,6 @@ void integrity_audit_msg(int audit_msgno, struct inode
> > *inode,>
> > audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, inode->i_sb->s_id);
> > audit_log_format(ab, " ino=%lu", inode->i_ino);
> >
> > }
> >
> > - audit_log_format(ab, " res=%d", !result);
> > + audit_log_format(ab, " res=%d result=%d", !result, result);
> >
> > audit_log_end(ab);
> >
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.27.0
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, rgb@redhat.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] integrity: Add result field in audit message
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:43:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41911815.FMGa2a4QOz@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhTmShh8ggdjLKf_ciL6fDt3ZH59BXaXMAgd8LFzqVj6rQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, June 15, 2020 6:51:22 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:26 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
>
> <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > Result code is not included in the audit messages logged by
> > the integrity subsystem. Add "result" field in the audit messages
> > logged by the integrity subsystem and set the value to the result code
> > passed to integrity_audit_msg() in the "result" parameter.
> >
> > Sample audit message:
> >
> > [ 6.284329] audit: type=1804 audit(1591756723.627:2): pid=1 uid=0
> > auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=kernel op=add_boot_aggregate
> > cause=alloc_entry comm="swapper/0" name="boot_aggregate" res=0
> > result=-12
> >
> > [ 8.085456] audit: type=1802 audit(1592005947.297:9): pid=1 uid=0
> > auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
> > op=policy_update cause=completed comm="systemd" res=1 result=0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
> > Suggested-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > security/integrity/integrity_audit.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> If we can't use "res=" to carry more than 0/1 then this seems reasonable.
Paul,
But we can't do this. The field name dictionary says this is used to convey
success/fail. It is hard coded in the field interpretation table to look for
0/1 and interpret that. Interpeting this field will now produce an error
message. And "result" is a searchable field.
As I suggested a few emails back, let's just use errno or something not
already taken in the dictionary. NACK.
-Steve
> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
>
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > b/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c index 5109173839cc..84002d3d5a95
> > 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/integrity_audit.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,6 @@ void integrity_audit_msg(int audit_msgno, struct inode
> > *inode,>
> > audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, inode->i_sb->s_id);
> > audit_log_format(ab, " ino=%lu", inode->i_ino);
> >
> > }
> >
> > - audit_log_format(ab, " res=%d", !result);
> > + audit_log_format(ab, " res=%d result=%d", !result, result);
> >
> > audit_log_end(ab);
> >
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-16 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-13 2:26 [PATCH v2 1/2] integrity: Add result field in audit message Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-13 2:26 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-13 2:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] IMA: Add audit log for failure conditions Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-13 2:26 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-15 22:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] integrity: Add result field in audit message Paul Moore
2020-06-15 22:51 ` Paul Moore
2020-06-16 15:43 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2020-06-16 15:43 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41911815.FMGa2a4QOz@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.