* pid_max madness
@ 2004-11-17 20:12 Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-11-17 20:41 ` linux-os
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz @ 2004-11-17 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel list
Let's do:
#echo "-1" >/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
#cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
-1
#
Madness, isn't ?
I guess that isn't what author ment it to behave like.
Anyway, does it mean that after max unsigned value is reached pids are
going to be negative in value ??
--
GJ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: pid_max madness
2004-11-17 20:12 pid_max madness Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
@ 2004-11-17 20:41 ` linux-os
2004-11-17 20:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-11-17 20:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: linux-os @ 2004-11-17 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz; +Cc: kernel list
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz wrote:
> Let's do:
> #echo "-1" >/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
> #cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
> -1
> #
>
> Madness, isn't ?
>
> I guess that isn't what author ment it to behave like.
> Anyway, does it mean that after max unsigned value is reached pids are going
> to be negative in value ??
>
> --
> GJ
> -
Seems to set them back to 300 on this system Linux-2.6.9. That's
an interesting side-effect. I like it! They never get much over
300 either!
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.9 on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips).
Notice : All mail here is now cached for review by John Ashcroft.
98.36% of all statistics are fiction.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: pid_max madness
2004-11-17 20:12 pid_max madness Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-11-17 20:41 ` linux-os
@ 2004-11-17 20:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-11-17 20:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Valdis.Kletnieks @ 2004-11-17 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz; +Cc: kernel list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 322 bytes --]
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:12:07 +0100, Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz said:
> Anyway, does it mean that after max unsigned value is reached pids are
> going to be negative in value ??
No, because something in the /proc drivers will die of indigestion *much*
sooner (I think it's some very low value like 64K or 128K on i386?)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: pid_max madness
2004-11-17 20:12 pid_max madness Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-11-17 20:41 ` linux-os
2004-11-17 20:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
@ 2004-11-17 20:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-17 20:59 ` Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2004-11-17 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz; +Cc: kernel list
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:12:07PM +0100, Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz wrote:
> Let's do:
> #echo "-1" >/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
> #cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
> -1
> #
> Madness, isn't ?
> I guess that isn't what author ment it to behave like.
> Anyway, does it mean that after max unsigned value is reached pids are
> going to be negative in value ??
Kernel version please?
-- wli
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: pid_max madness
2004-11-17 20:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
@ 2004-11-17 20:59 ` Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-11-17 21:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz @ 2004-11-17 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Lee Irwin III; +Cc: kernel list
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:12:07PM +0100, Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz wrote:
>
>>Let's do:
>>#echo "-1" >/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
>>#cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max
>>-1
>>#
>>Madness, isn't ?
>>I guess that isn't what author ment it to behave like.
>>Anyway, does it mean that after max unsigned value is reached pids are
>>going to be negative in value ??
>
>
> Kernel version please?
all 2.6.x on intel86, this exact one is 2.6.9.
on 2.6.10-rc1-mm4 it doesn't change it anymore.
--
GJ
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 5.89824e37 Oct 22 1990 /usr/bin/emacs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: pid_max madness
2004-11-17 20:59 ` Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
@ 2004-11-17 21:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2004-11-17 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz; +Cc: kernel list
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Kernel version please?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:59:37PM +0100, Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz wrote:
> all 2.6.x on intel86, this exact one is 2.6.9.
> on 2.6.10-rc1-mm4 it doesn't change it anymore.
Okay, good to hear I didn't miss this piece of the fixes.
Thanks.
-- wli
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-18 2:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-17 20:12 pid_max madness Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-11-17 20:41 ` linux-os
2004-11-17 20:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-11-17 20:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-17 20:59 ` Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-11-17 21:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.