All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ray Bryant <raybry@sgi.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>, Dean Roe <roe@sgi.com>,
	Brian Sumner <bls@sgi.com>,
	John Hawkes <hawkes@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: scalability of signal delivery for Posix Threads
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:25:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A23D15.3040207@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041122171932.GA19440@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com>

Robin Holt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 09:51:15AM -0600, Ray Bryant wrote:
> 
>>We've encountered a scalability problem with signal delivery.  Our 
>>application
>>is attempting to use ITIMER_PROF to deliver one signal per clock tick to 
>>each
>>thread of a ptrheaded (NPTL).  These threads are created with CLONE_SIGHAND,
>>so that there is a single sighand->siglock for the entire application.
> 
> 
> Ray, can you provide a simple example application that trips this case?

I'll do that, but it may be after the Thanksgiving holiday when I get it
out to the mailing list.  It's a minor thing, but the test we are using
now is an OpenMP application (written in .c) and I'd propose rewriting
it using POSIX threads without OpenMP for a more general audience

-- 
Best Regards,
Ray
-----------------------------------------------
                   Ray Bryant
512-453-9679 (work)         512-507-7807 (cell)
raybry@sgi.com             raybry@austin.rr.com
The box said: "Requires Windows 98 or better",
            so I installed Linux.
-----------------------------------------------

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ray Bryant <raybry@sgi.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>, Dean Roe <roe@sgi.com>,
	Brian Sumner <bls@sgi.com>,
	John Hawkes <hawkes@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: scalability of signal delivery for Posix Threads
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:25:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A23D15.3040207@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041122171932.GA19440@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com>

Robin Holt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 09:51:15AM -0600, Ray Bryant wrote:
> 
>>We've encountered a scalability problem with signal delivery.  Our 
>>application
>>is attempting to use ITIMER_PROF to deliver one signal per clock tick to 
>>each
>>thread of a ptrheaded (NPTL).  These threads are created with CLONE_SIGHAND,
>>so that there is a single sighand->siglock for the entire application.
> 
> 
> Ray, can you provide a simple example application that trips this case?

I'll do that, but it may be after the Thanksgiving holiday when I get it
out to the mailing list.  It's a minor thing, but the test we are using
now is an OpenMP application (written in .c) and I'd propose rewriting
it using POSIX threads without OpenMP for a more general audience

-- 
Best Regards,
Ray
-----------------------------------------------
                   Ray Bryant
512-453-9679 (work)         512-507-7807 (cell)
raybry@sgi.com             raybry@austin.rr.com
The box said: "Requires Windows 98 or better",
            so I installed Linux.
-----------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-22 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-22 15:51 scalability of signal delivery for Posix Threads Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 15:51 ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 16:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-11-22 19:49   ` [Lse-tech] " Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 19:49     ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 19:53     ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 19:53       ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 16:22 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 16:22   ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 16:51   ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-22 16:51     ` Andreas Schwab
2004-11-22 16:54     ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 16:54       ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 18:56       ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 18:56         ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 19:22       ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 19:22         ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 17:23   ` Philip J. Mucci
2004-11-22 17:23     ` Philip J. Mucci
2004-11-22 21:26   ` Boehm, Hans
2004-11-22 21:26     ` Boehm, Hans
2004-11-22 21:34     ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-22 21:34       ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-01 22:53       ` Brent Casavant
2004-12-01 22:53         ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-22 21:27   ` Rick Lindsley
2004-11-22 21:27     ` Rick Lindsley
2004-11-22 23:39     ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 23:39       ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-22 23:01   ` Boehm, Hans
2004-11-22 23:01     ` Boehm, Hans
2004-11-22 17:19 ` Robin Holt
2004-11-22 17:19   ` Robin Holt
2004-11-22 19:25   ` Ray Bryant [this message]
2004-11-22 19:25     ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-23 20:42   ` Ray Bryant
2004-11-23 20:42     ` Ray Bryant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41A23D15.3040207@sgi.com \
    --to=raybry@sgi.com \
    --cc=bls@sgi.com \
    --cc=hawkes@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=roe@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.