All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bridge] Bridge Performance 2
@ 2004-12-03 14:42 Patrick Stuedi
  2004-12-03 15:42 ` Mark S. Mathews
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Stuedi @ 2004-12-03 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bridge

Hi there,

I was asking this question already a few days go, but I'm not sure whether anyone noticed due to the mailserver outtage. So I'm just re-posting it, sorry, but it's an important issue for me, I would be glad to hear some insight on this.  
 
The question is regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card. On each laptop I configure the wireless cards to be in ad hoc mode, create a bridge and include the interface within the bridge (stp is off). Then of course I'm assigning an IP address to the bridge while assigning 0.0.0.0 to the wireless interface (eth1). After having setup both machines I run throughput tests using iperf. What I measure is around 1.5 Mbit/s for TCP traffic. This is about 1/3 of what I get when communicating directly through the wireless interface on both machines, without any bridge on top. Where all this performance gets lost? Does anyone have an idea? The same performance degradation I measured on a 2.6 Kernel.
 
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Best Regards, 
Patrick



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bridge] Bridge Performance 2
  2004-12-03 14:42 [Bridge] Bridge Performance 2 Patrick Stuedi
@ 2004-12-03 15:42 ` Mark S. Mathews
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark S. Mathews @ 2004-12-03 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick Stuedi; +Cc: bridge


See the FAQ at http://bridge.sourceforge.net/faq.html for the answer.

-M

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Patrick Stuedi wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I was asking this question already a few days go, but I'm not sure whether 
> anyone noticed due to the mailserver outtage. So I'm just re-posting it, 
> sorry, but it's an important issue for me, I would be glad to hear some 
> insight on this. 
> The question is regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My 
> setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card. On each 
> laptop I configure the wireless cards to be in ad hoc mode, create a bridge 
> and include the interface within the bridge (stp is off). Then of course I'm 
> assigning an IP address to the bridge while assigning 0.0.0.0 to the wireless 
> interface (eth1). After having setup both machines I run throughput tests 
> using iperf. What I measure is around 1.5 Mbit/s for TCP traffic. This is 
> about 1/3 of what I get when communicating directly through the wireless 
> interface on both machines, without any bridge on top. Where all this 
> performance gets lost? Does anyone have an idea? The same performance 
> degradation I measured on a 2.6 Kernel.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Best Regards, Patrick
>
>
>

-- 

Mark S. Mathews

AbsoluteValue Systems      Web:    http://www.linux-wlan.com
721-D North Drive          e-mail: mark@linux-wlan.com
Melbourne, FL 32934        Phone:  321.259.0737
USA                        Fax:    321.259.0286

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-03 15:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-03 14:42 [Bridge] Bridge Performance 2 Patrick Stuedi
2004-12-03 15:42 ` Mark S. Mathews

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.