All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Hopf <gerald.hopf@nv-systems.net>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_sil problems (lockup at boottime)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:16:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41B4DA37.5060209@nv-systems.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58cb370e04120508104243799a@mail.gmail.com>

Hello everyone,

i'm using this post to answer to multiple questions of more than one 
person, so bear in mind that the quotes are not all from the same 
person/post.

Oliver Bausinger wrote:

>>I have the same problem with this hardware. The harddisk is a SAMSUNG SP1614C
>>again and the controller is this one:
>>    
>>
Great ! I really like the idea that i'm not the only one with this 
problem :-)

Oliver Bausinger wrote:
>> I tried quite a lot to get rid of those problems, including:
>> - Flashing a new/different Bios (even with different versions of the
>> Silicon Image SATA Bios part: 4.2.47 and 4.2.50)

>Where did you get it? URL?

I got it from here: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/michael.mcclay/
It's the "A7N8X-Dlx Uber 1009-BETA Sata Enhanced with new SATA bios v4.2.50  <- new (20th nov 04)".

I read about this Bios in the http://www.nforcershq.com/ Forums.

Works fine, but didn't change much (well, actually, it changed nothing regarding this problem...).

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

>Looks like some other device is using the same IRQ
>(it is not handled correctly and gets disabled).
>
>  
>
On my system, according to the lspci command no IRQs are shared. Only 4 
IRQs are in use, and none of them shared (with all the onboard stuff 
disabled).

Oliver Bausinger wrote:

>>I think I can rule out hardware problems because a FreeBSD 5.3 install
>>worked flawlessly on this disk.
>>    
>>
Same here, this hardware combination has worked absolutely flawless in 
Windows XP for months!

I wrote and Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz commented/asked:

>>>This problem has been there in all of the latest 2.6.X kernel revisions.
>>>I'm currently using 2.6.10-rc3 (which came out today), but i've allready
>>>had this problem in 2.6.9 and 2.6.8 and probably even 2.6.7 if i
>>>remember correctly.
>>>      
>>>
>Was it working before 2.6.7?
>  
>
I only recently tried to make this work, so i was not sure about this.
Therefor I just did some (time-consuming) tests with all Kernels between 
2.6.5 and 2.6.10-rc3:

Kernel 2.6.5:
- Bootet once and seemed to work, however only ONCE! Unable to reproduce 
this even with many reboots.
- (also i am not 100% sure if it actually worked this ONE time, cfdisk 
claimed the disk had no partitioning information on it which i thought 
it should have had... partitioning and reiserfs-formating worked fine 
though)
- In all following boots, the same strange errors, but continued to boot.
- Pictures of the strange errors and continued booting:
- http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil4.jpg (page 1)
- http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil5.jpg (page 2)
- http://www.nv-systems.net/pics/lkml/sata_sil6.jpg (same as page 2 but 
slightly different error from another try)
- After booting, harddrive does not respond, commands which access it 
(like cfdisk or mount) hang forever.

Kernel 2.6.6:
- Same as 2.6.5, except it didn't even work once.

Kernel 2.6.7:
- Same as 2.6.5, except it didn't even work once.

Kernel 2.6.8.1:
- Same as 2.6.5, except it didn't even work once.

Kernel 2.6.9:
- Hangs during bootup, like described in my original Post here!

Kernel 2.6.10-rc3
- Same behaviour as in 2.6.9

I also tried the depreciated siimage driver (thanks to the 
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA tip, i didn't notice this before and had the 
same problems) with kernel 2.6.9,
works flawless (as far as i can tell from such a short test, hdparm -t = 
60MB/s). No strange IRQ disabled errors during bootup. Flawless of 
course only if you ignore that it takes AGES until it finally gives up 
probing the second SATA port. I know someone who bought a second SATA 
harddrive just because booting took so long!

I guess i should switch to a more PROMISing SATA controller as soon as 
possible... ;-)

Yours sincerely,
                  Gerald Hopf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-06 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-04 23:34 sata_sil problems (lockup at boottime) Gerald Hopf
2004-12-05  8:08 ` Oliver Bausinger
2004-12-05 14:15   ` siimage annoyance (was: ata_sil problems (lockup at boottime)) Oliver Bausinger
2004-12-05 16:10   ` sata_sil problems (lockup at boottime) Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-12-05 16:38     ` Oliver Bausinger
2004-12-06 22:16     ` Gerald Hopf [this message]
2004-12-07  8:40       ` Oliver Bausinger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-04 23:09 Gerald Hopf
2005-01-10 15:34 ` Doug McLain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41B4DA37.5060209@nv-systems.net \
    --to=gerald.hopf@nv-systems.net \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.