is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

[Federico Lucifredi]

err, Why oh Why is all netfilter mail coming from 1969 ? Is Doug 
Engelbart in charge of this project ?

-Federico

_________________________________________
-- "Where the tides of Fortune take us, no one can know" 
	- Chancellor Gowron

Muad'Dib of Caladan (Federico L. Lucifredi)- Harvard University & BU
http://metcs.bu.edu/~lucifred

Re: is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

[Jason Opperisano]

On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 14:13, Federico Lucifredi wrote:
> err, Why oh Why is all netfilter mail coming from 1969 ? Is Doug 
> Engelbart in charge of this project ?
> 
> -Federico

huh?

-j

--
"Please do not offer my god a peanut"
	--The Simpsons

RE: is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

[Rob Sterenborg]

netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org wrote:
> err, Why oh Why is all netfilter mail coming from 1969 ? Is
> Doug Engelbart in charge of this project ?

Uh.. Not here it isn't.


Gr,
Rob

Re: is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

[Michelle Konzack]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]

Am 2004-12-10 17:13:55, schrieb Federico Lucifredi:
> Hello List,

> Well.... here the clock is set to Dec 10th, 2004. Why are all my digests 
> coming from 1969? don't tell me its the timezone =)

Maybe the mailgateway has used the SG1  :-)

> -Federico


Greetings
Michelle

-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ 
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

RE: is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

[Federico Lucifredi]

Hello List,

>Message: 10
>Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:22:35 +0100
>From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@sterenborg.info>
>Subject: RE: is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?
>To: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
>Message-ID: <20041210212225.15F772F433@kshira.sterenborg.info>
>Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="US-ASCII"
>
>netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org wrote:
>  
>
>>> err, Why oh Why is all netfilter mail coming from 1969 ? Is
>>> Doug Engelbart in charge of this project ?
>>    
>>
>
>Uh.. Not here it isn't.
>
>
>Gr,
>Rob
>  
>
Well.... here the clock is set to Dec 10th, 2004. Why are all my digests 
coming from 1969? don't tell me its the timezone =)

-Federico

 
_________________________________________
-- "'Problem' is a bleak word for challenge" - Richard Fish

Muad'Dib of Caladan (Federico L. Lucifredi)- Harvard University & BU
http://metcs.bu.edu/~lucifred

RE: is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

[Rob Sterenborg]

>> Well.... here the clock is set to Dec 10th, 2004. Why are all my
>> digests coming from 1969? don't tell me its the timezone =)

Don't know ; looking at the headers of email I receive, all dates/times
seem to be correct.
Did you check the email headers to see what is happening ?

> Maybe the mailgateway has used the SG1  :-)

Heheh.. That would be something. ;-)


Gr,
Rob

RE: is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

[Gary W. Smith]

Not the time zone, the twilight zone...  Maybe you hit the outer limits
of your email server/relay...  After all they do control your
television.

Gary

> Well.... here the clock is set to Dec 10th, 2004. Why are all my
digests
> coming from 1969? don't tell me its the timezone =)
> 
> -Federico
> 

RE: is this 1969 ? Are we on the moon yet?

[Federico Lucifredi]

Hello Flower Children,
    I am still in the twilight zone as far as the "mail from 1969" issue 
is concerned.... I guess they control my tv after all =)

-------8<----------HEADERS-----------------

Received: (qmail 29490 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 01:59:30 -0000
Received: from alias2.acm.org ([199.222.69.92])
          (envelope-sender <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>)
          by mail15.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP
          for <federico@speakeasy.net>; 14 Dec 2004 01:59:28 -0000
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.2.103])
        by alias2.acm.org (ACM Email Forwarding Service) with SMTP id KJA74473
        for <flucifredi@acm.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:59:21 -0500
Received: from source ([213.95.27.115]) by exprod7mx53.postini.com ([64.18.6.10]) with SMTP;
	Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:59:19 PST
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=vishnu.netfilter.org)
	by vishnu.netfilter.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ce2Am-0004dm-Ia; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 03:12:20 +0100
From: netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: netfilter Digest, Vol 5, Issue 21
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Reply-To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on mail15.speakeasy.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_MISSING,
	NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64

Send netfilter mailing list submissions to
	netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	netfilter-owner@lists.netfilter.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of netfilter digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: ipset question (Brett Oster)

  [...snap!..]

-------8<----------

These seem fine to me... Thunderbird bug maybe ?

    -Federico