questions

questions

[Jean Delvare]

Hi folks

Two questions:

1* How is it possible that the chipset documentation
(lm_sensors2/doc/chips/*) is still up-to-date when the generation scipt,
prog/doc/doc-features.pl, is broken since version 2.4.4?

2* How can the logical mapping and the compute mapping differ for a
given feature?

I am in process to rewriting the two doc generating scripts in prog/doc
(seems that Frodo left some times ago and the scripts are unmaintained)
and I need these two pieces of information to go on. All related
information will be welcome also.

Thanks.

-- 
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/

Questions

[Mark Studebaker]

since your chip is an lm85 you must have a chip section headed with
chip "lm85-*"


Paul Aviles wrote:
> Jean,
> 
> Happy holidays to you all and best wishes for the new year!!
> 
> 
> 
> Quick question, I have sensors 2.8.8  running on a Tyan GS12 server with 
> FC1 and kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl and I got everything working.
> 
> 
> 
> I am curious about a problem. Take a look at my results of sensors. I 
> have an alarm on in4 and also shows fan4 which I don't have. My 
> sensors.conf is also below and it is supposed to ignore in4 and fan4. Is 
> there any other way to eliminate those from being reported?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks so much.
> 
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> #sensors
> 
> lm85-i2c-0-2e
> Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1480
> in0:        +2.62 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +3.32 V)
> in1:        +1.31 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +2.99 V)
> in2:        +3.37 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.38 V)
> in3:       +5.13 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +6.64 V)
> in4:       +0.00 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max = +15.94 V)   ALARM
> fan1:      9294 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
> fan2:      8169 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
> fan3:      9712 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
> fan4:         0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
> temp1:       +61?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
> temp2:       +41?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
> temp3:       +43?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
> pwm1:       86
> pwm2:      113
> pwm3:       88
> vid:      +1.325 V  (VRM Version 9.1)
> 
> /etc/sensors.conf
> chip "adt7463-*"
> 
>    ignore pwm1
>    ignore pwm2
>    ignore pwm3
>    ignore in4
>    ignore fan4
> 
>    label in0 "+2.6V"
>    label in1 "CPU Volt"
>    label in2 "+3.3V"
>    label in3 "+5V"
> 
>    label fan1 "fan2"
>    label fan2 "fan1"
>    label fan3 "fan3"
> 
>    label pwm1 "pwm1 fan"
>    label pwm2 "pwm2 fan"
>    label pwm3 "pwm3 fan"
> 
>    label temp1 "CPU Temp"
>    label temp2 "Local Temp"
>    label temp3 "System Temp"
> 
>    set in0_min  2.6 * 0.95
>    set in0_max  2.6 * 1.05
>    set in1_min  1.45 * 0.95
>    set in1_max  1.45 * 1.05
>    set in2_min  3.3 * 0.95
>    set in2_max  3.3 * 1.05
>    set in3_min  5.0 * 0.95
>    set in3_max  5.0 * 1.05
> 
>    set vrm  9.1[
> 
> 

Questions

[Mark Studebaker]

did you rerun depmod after installing lm85?

Paul Aviles wrote:
> I am getting something weird.
> [root@www /]# modprobe lm85
> modprobe: Can't locate module lm85
> 
> [root@www /]# insmod lm85
> Using /lib/modules/2.4.22-1.2174.nptl/kernel/drivers/i2c/chips/lm85.o
> 
> Why will modprobe fail loading but insmod work?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 

Questions

[Paul Aviles]

Jean,

Happy holidays to you all and best wishes for the new year!!



Quick question, I have sensors 2.8.8  running on a Tyan GS12 server with FC1 
and kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl and I got everything working.



I am curious about a problem. Take a look at my results of sensors. I have 
an alarm on in4 and also shows fan4 which I don't have. My sensors.conf is 
also below and it is supposed to ignore in4 and fan4. Is there any other way 
to eliminate those from being reported?



Thanks so much.



Paul


#sensors

lm85-i2c-0-2e
Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1480
in0:        +2.62 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +3.32 V)
in1:        +1.31 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +2.99 V)
in2:        +3.37 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.38 V)
in3:       +5.13 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +6.64 V)
in4:       +0.00 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max = +15.94 V)   ALARM
fan1:      9294 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
fan2:      8169 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
fan3:      9712 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
fan4:         0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
temp1:       +61?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
temp2:       +41?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
temp3:       +43?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
pwm1:       86
pwm2:      113
pwm3:       88
vid:      +1.325 V  (VRM Version 9.1)

/etc/sensors.conf
chip "adt7463-*"

    ignore pwm1
    ignore pwm2
    ignore pwm3
    ignore in4
    ignore fan4

    label in0 "+2.6V"
    label in1 "CPU Volt"
    label in2 "+3.3V"
    label in3 "+5V"

    label fan1 "fan2"
    label fan2 "fan1"
    label fan3 "fan3"

    label pwm1 "pwm1 fan"
    label pwm2 "pwm2 fan"
    label pwm3 "pwm3 fan"

    label temp1 "CPU Temp"
    label temp2 "Local Temp"
    label temp3 "System Temp"

    set in0_min  2.6 * 0.95
    set in0_max  2.6 * 1.05
    set in1_min  1.45 * 0.95
    set in1_max  1.45 * 1.05
    set in2_min  3.3 * 0.95
    set in2_max  3.3 * 1.05
    set in3_min  5.0 * 0.95
    set in3_max  5.0 * 1.05

    set vrm  9.1[ 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Questions

[Paul Aviles]

Man... I looked at that file for hours....

THANKS!!!!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Studebaker" <mds4@verizon.net>
To: "Paul Aviles" <paul.aviles@palei.com>
Cc: <sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: Questions


> since your chip is an lm85 you must have a chip section headed with
> chip "lm85-*"
>
>
> Paul Aviles wrote:
>> Jean,
>>
>> Happy holidays to you all and best wishes for the new year!!
>>
>>
>>
>> Quick question, I have sensors 2.8.8  running on a Tyan GS12 server with 
>> FC1 and kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl and I got everything working.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am curious about a problem. Take a look at my results of sensors. I 
>> have an alarm on in4 and also shows fan4 which I don't have. My 
>> sensors.conf is also below and it is supposed to ignore in4 and fan4. Is 
>> there any other way to eliminate those from being reported?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks so much.
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> #sensors
>>
>> lm85-i2c-0-2e
>> Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1480
>> in0:        +2.62 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +3.32 V)
>> in1:        +1.31 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +2.99 V)
>> in2:        +3.37 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.38 V)
>> in3:       +5.13 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +6.64 V)
>> in4:       +0.00 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max = +15.94 V)   ALARM
>> fan1:      9294 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
>> fan2:      8169 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
>> fan3:      9712 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
>> fan4:         0 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
>> temp1:       +61?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
>> temp2:       +41?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
>> temp3:       +43?C  (low  =  -127?C, high =  +127?C)
>> pwm1:       86
>> pwm2:      113
>> pwm3:       88
>> vid:      +1.325 V  (VRM Version 9.1)
>>
>> /etc/sensors.conf
>> chip "adt7463-*"
>>
>>    ignore pwm1
>>    ignore pwm2
>>    ignore pwm3
>>    ignore in4
>>    ignore fan4
>>
>>    label in0 "+2.6V"
>>    label in1 "CPU Volt"
>>    label in2 "+3.3V"
>>    label in3 "+5V"
>>
>>    label fan1 "fan2"
>>    label fan2 "fan1"
>>    label fan3 "fan3"
>>
>>    label pwm1 "pwm1 fan"
>>    label pwm2 "pwm2 fan"
>>    label pwm3 "pwm3 fan"
>>
>>    label temp1 "CPU Temp"
>>    label temp2 "Local Temp"
>>    label temp3 "System Temp"
>>
>>    set in0_min  2.6 * 0.95
>>    set in0_max  2.6 * 1.05
>>    set in1_min  1.45 * 0.95
>>    set in1_max  1.45 * 1.05
>>    set in2_min  3.3 * 0.95
>>    set in2_max  3.3 * 1.05
>>    set in3_min  5.0 * 0.95
>>    set in3_max  5.0 * 1.05
>>
>>    set vrm  9.1[
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Fw: Questions

[Mark Studebaker]

see prog/rrd in our package.
also prog/tellerstats.

Paul Aviles wrote:
> I forgot, the samples under http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/uses.html 
> are no good. Any cgi's out there to generate the graphs?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Paul
> 
> 

Questions

[Paul Aviles]

Guys, im I trying to come up with an rpm for version 2.8.8 and I am getting 
no luck. Has anyone created the spec files for both the i2c and lmsensors?

Thanks

Paul 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Questions

[Paul Aviles]

I am getting something weird. 

[root@www /]# modprobe lm85
modprobe: Can't locate module lm85

[root@www /]# insmod lm85
Using /lib/modules/2.4.22-1.2174.nptl/kernel/drivers/i2c/chips/lm85.o

Why will modprobe fail loading but insmod work?

Thanks



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Fw: Questions

[Paul Aviles]

I forgot, the samples under http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/uses.html are no 
good. Any cgi's out there to generate the graphs?

Thanks

Paul 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.