All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* NAT Server, SMP box or Single CPU box?
@ 2004-12-27 13:12 Donato Diaz
  2004-12-29 13:15 ` NAT Server Performance, " Donato Diaz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Donato Diaz @ 2004-12-27 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 453 bytes --]

Hi,

I have read in different lists that some people are having problem doing 
NAT with SMP Servers, due to the way the kernel manage conntrack with 
both CPUs.
NAT runs slower on Server SMP with two CPUs?
Is it better a Server with one faster CPU than a server with two CPUs?
I need to buy a NAT Server for +1500 users. I would like to know if an 
SMP Server with two CPUs is the best choice.

Any help would be really appreciated.
Thanks all,
Donato.

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3018 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* NAT Server Performance, SMP box or Single CPU box?
  2004-12-27 13:12 NAT Server, SMP box or Single CPU box? Donato Diaz
@ 2004-12-29 13:15 ` Donato Diaz
  2005-01-04 11:05   ` Harald Welte
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Donato Diaz @ 2004-12-29 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter-devel

Hello,
I have read in different lists that some people are having problem doing 
NAT with SMP Servers, due to the way the kernel manage conntrack with 
both CPUs.
NAT runs slower on Server SMP with two CPUs?
Is it better a Server with one faster CPU than a server with two CPUs?
I need to buy a NAT Server for +1500 users. I would like to know if an 
SMP Server with two CPUs is the best choice.

Any help would be really appreciated.
Thanks all,
Donato.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: NAT Server Performance, SMP box or Single CPU box?
  2004-12-29 13:15 ` NAT Server Performance, " Donato Diaz
@ 2005-01-04 11:05   ` Harald Welte
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Harald Welte @ 2005-01-04 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Donato Diaz; +Cc: netfilter-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 954 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 10:15:21AM -0300, Donato Diaz wrote:
> Hello,
> I have read in different lists that some people are having problem doing 
> NAT with SMP Servers, due to the way the kernel manage conntrack with 
> both CPUs.

this isn't a development question. Please follow-up to
netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

> NAT runs slower on Server SMP with two CPUs?

no, but the gain is not something like 'twice the performance'.  

with networking, your i/o subsystem (64bit, pci-x, fast RAM, ...) is way
more important than cpu speed.

> Thanks all,
> Donato.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-04 11:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-27 13:12 NAT Server, SMP box or Single CPU box? Donato Diaz
2004-12-29 13:15 ` NAT Server Performance, " Donato Diaz
2005-01-04 11:05   ` Harald Welte

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.