[uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?

[uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?

[Rob Landley]

I'm under the impression blaisorblade isn't going to continue his "stable" 
tree now that patches are flowing easily into main, but the hang I'm seeing 
in 2.6.9-bb persists (I tried mem=64M but that didn't help either).  Probably 
something small and simple to fix, but I haven't tracked it down yet...

I can't get 2.6.11-rc1 ARCH=um to compile.  (Fixed the first build break to 
receive a more elaborate one shortly thereafter, which is not a good sign...)

Is there a recommended tree I should be looking at?

Rob


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?

[Frank Sorenson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeff Dike wrote:
| rob@landley.net said:
|
|>I can't get 2.6.11-rc1 ARCH=um to compile.  (Fixed the first build
|>break to  receive a more elaborate one shortly thereafter, which is
|>not a good sign...)
|>
|>Is there a recommended tree I should be looking at?
|
|
| rc1-mm1 builds and runs fine.
|
| 				Jeff

I've found that I also need the pud_alloc-declaration patch to get
2.6.11-rc1-mm1 to compile:
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.10-mm3/patches/pud_alloc-declaration

Other than that, 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 has worked very well for me.

Frank
- --
Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK
Systems Manager, Computer Science Department
Brigham Young University
frank@tuxrocks.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB6yMIaI0dwg4A47wRAs3YAKCMjlmMzMtZhPKNf+GRezrSNHuh4QCgzRGw
fTMfbrMkOYkIJhbrznQRp6U=
=4UU2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Recommended "head" branch?

[Jeff Dike]

rob@landley.net said:
> I can't get 2.6.11-rc1 ARCH=um to compile.  (Fixed the first build
> break to  receive a more elaborate one shortly thereafter, which is
> not a good sign...)
>
> Is there a recommended tree I should be looking at? 

rc1-mm1 builds and runs fine.

				Jeff



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel