From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Charles-Edouard Ruault <ce@idtect.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IO port conflict between timer & watchdog on PCISA-C800EV board ?
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:31:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <420797DE.6030904@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <420734DC.4020900@idtect.com>
Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> i wrote a driver for the watchdog timer provided by a small form factor
> board from IEI ( the PCISA-C800EV :
> http://www.iei.com.tw/en/product_IPC.asp?model=PCISA-C800 ).
> This board has a Via Apollo PLE133 ( VT8601A and VT82C686B ) chipset.
> The watchdog uses two registers at addresses 0x43 and 0x443, therefore
> my driver tries to get bot addresses for its own use calling
> request_region(0x43, 1, "watchdog" ) and request_region(0x443, 1,
> "watchdog").
> The first call to request 0x43 fails because the address has already
> been allocated to the timer ( /proc/ioports shows 0040-005f : timer ).
>
> So my questions are :
> - Why is the generic timer using this address ? isn't it reserving a too
> wide portion of IO ports ? Should it be modified for this board ?
> - If there's a good reason for the timer to request this address, is
> there a clean way to share it with the timer ?
Missing kernel version.... must be "not the current/latest",
so early 2.6 or more likely 2.4 (just guessing)?
/proc/ioports timer assignments have now been split up like this:
0040-0043 : timer0
0050-0053 : timer1
However, port 0x43 is still assigned to timer0, so your request_region
call will still fail. What system board timer resource assignments
should be used for that VIA chipset? If the chipset timer only needs
0x40-0x42, e.g., leaving 0x43 available, then it would be possible
to do some kind of workaround (maybe not real clean, but possible).
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-07 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-07 9:29 IO port conflict between timer & watchdog on PCISA-C800EV board ? Charles-Edouard Ruault
2005-02-07 16:31 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-02-07 17:00 ` linux-os
2005-02-07 17:33 ` Charles-Edouard Ruault
2005-02-07 17:32 ` Charles-Edouard Ruault
2005-02-07 17:57 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-02-15 17:04 ` Alan Cox
2005-02-21 13:06 ` [PATCH] Reserve only needed regions for PC timers on i386 and x86_64 Charles-Edouard Ruault
2005-02-23 7:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=420797DE.6030904@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=ce@idtect.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.