All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Multipath target does not shift block offset?
@ 2005-02-12  4:45 Tim Burgess
  2005-02-14  1:42 ` block offset shift, mirroring bug resolved? Tim Burgess
  2005-02-16 16:02 ` Multipath target does not shift block offset? Kevin Corry
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Burgess @ 2005-02-12  4:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dm-devel

Re the patch from Kevin:

there looks like there is another reference to ti->begin in dm-raid1.c
that the patch does not remove (in do_write).  I wasn't sure whether to 
leave it there or not, since you were talking about making each target 
unaware of its position within the overall mapped device...?

(note that my copy is not the latest - it's SUSE SLES SP1, so I
apologise if anything I say is not 100% true for the latest code :S)

Related:

I noticed that a similar collection of concatenated raid1 devices
(description below) was behaving strangely also, and splitting each
raid1 map into its own table fixed the problem...

For some reason, each of the mirror pairs was writing to its primary 
leg, but only the first one listed in the file was writing to its second 
leg...  (note that this is before Kevin's patches - will try them in a 
moment!).



> On Thursday 10 February 2005 11:18 am, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:02:28PM +1100, Tim Burgess wrote:
>> > However, dm appears to be trying
>> > to map the range 286749488-573498975 of the dm device to the same
>> > offsets in the sde/sdm device.
>> >
>> > Is this what was intended?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> In dm-mpath.c try adding to multipath_map() at the top of the function:
>>
>>   bio->bi_sector = (bio->bi_sector - ti->begin);
> 
> Actually, now that you point this out, I think this responsibility should
> really be handled by the core driver's I/O path instead of each target
> module. There's really no reason for the target modules to care or even
> know about the presence of multiple targets within a device table. We can
> move this line into the core's __map_bio() and get rid of a lot of
> duplicate code. Here's a patch to demonstrate what I'm talking about.
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     ANU Supercomputer Facility
    tim.burgess@anu.edu.au           and APAC National Facility
    Phone: +61 2 6125 1431           Leonard Huxley Bldg (No. 56)
    Fax:   +61 2 6125 8199           Australian National University
                                     Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* block offset shift, mirroring bug resolved?
  2005-02-12  4:45 Multipath target does not shift block offset? Tim Burgess
@ 2005-02-14  1:42 ` Tim Burgess
  2005-02-16 16:02 ` Multipath target does not shift block offset? Kevin Corry
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Burgess @ 2005-02-14  1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: device-mapper development

I've tried Kevin Corry's patches (with my extra modification to 
do_write, as quoted below), and the mirroring problem seems resolved.  I 
might have a poke around and see if I can figure out why it was happening...

The setup I had was:

#!/bin/sh
dmsetup remove_all

dmsetup create mirror <<EOF
0 16777216 mirror core 1 2048 2 /dev/sdd 0 /dev/sdt 0
16777216 16777216 mirror core 1 2048 2 /dev/sde 0 /dev/sdu 0
33554432 16777216 mirror core 1 2048 2 /dev/sdf 0 /dev/sdv 0
50331648 16777216 mirror core 1 2048 2 /dev/sdg 0 /dev/sdw 0
67108864 16777216 mirror core 1 2048 2 /dev/sdp 0 /dev/sdae 0
83886080 16777216 mirror core 1 2048 2 /dev/sdq 0 /dev/sdaf 0
100663296 16777216 mirror core 1 2048 2 /dev/sdr 0 /dev/sdag 0
117440512 16777216 mirror core 1 2048 2 /dev/sds 0 /dev/sdah 0
EOF

dmsetup create reliable <<EOF
0 134217728 striped 8 512 /dev/mapper/mirror 0 /dev/mapper/mirror 
16777216 /dev/mapper/mirror 33554432 /dev/mapper/mirror 50331648 
/dev/mapper/mirror 67108864 /dev/mapper/mirror 83886080 
/dev/mapper/mirror 100663296 /dev/mapper/mirror 117440512
EOF

Writing to /dev/mapper/reliable in the above configuration caused i/o to 
/dev/sd[defgpqrs] (the primary legs) and /dev/sdt but none of the other 
secondary mirror legs.

As I said before though, Kevin's patch + the extra bit fixes this.  I'd 
post a patch but since I'm running an older version there's probably not 
much point.

I'm seeing kernel panics using the mirror target though - another post 
follows.

Cheers,
Tim

The extra change (haven't tested without, it just made sense to change 
this too - correct me if I'm wrong here!) was:

function do_write() in dm-raid1.c

Old:

         for (i = 0; i < ms->nr_mirrors; i++) {
                 m = ms->mirror + i;

                 io[i].bdev = m->dev->bdev;
                 io[i].sector = m->offset + (bio->bi_sector - 
ms->ti->begin);
                 io[i].count = bio->bi_size >> 9;
         }


New:

         for (i = 0; i < ms->nr_mirrors; i++) {
                 m = ms->mirror + i;

                 io[i].bdev = m->dev->bdev;
                 io[i].sector = m->offset + bio->bi_sector;
                 io[i].count = bio->bi_size >> 9;
         }



Tim Burgess wrote:

> Re the patch from Kevin:
> 
> there looks like there is another reference to ti->begin in dm-raid1.c
> that the patch does not remove (in do_write).  I wasn't sure whether to 
> leave it there or not, since you were talking about making each target 
> unaware of its position within the overall mapped device...?
> 
> (note that my copy is not the latest - it's SUSE SLES SP1, so I
> apologise if anything I say is not 100% true for the latest code :S)
> 
> Related:
> 
> I noticed that a similar collection of concatenated raid1 devices
> (description below) was behaving strangely also, and splitting each
> raid1 map into its own table fixed the problem...
> 
> For some reason, each of the mirror pairs was writing to its primary 
> leg, but only the first one listed in the file was writing to its second 
> leg...  (note that this is before Kevin's patches - will try them in a 
> moment!).
> 
> 
> 
>> On Thursday 10 February 2005 11:18 am, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:02:28PM +1100, Tim Burgess wrote:
>>> > However, dm appears to be trying
>>> > to map the range 286749488-573498975 of the dm device to the same
>>> > offsets in the sde/sdm device.
>>> >
>>> > Is this what was intended?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> In dm-mpath.c try adding to multipath_map() at the top of the function:
>>>
>>>   bio->bi_sector = (bio->bi_sector - ti->begin);
>>
>>
>> Actually, now that you point this out, I think this responsibility should
>> really be handled by the core driver's I/O path instead of each target
>> module. There's really no reason for the target modules to care or even
>> know about the presence of multiple targets within a device table. We can
>> move this line into the core's __map_bio() and get rid of a lot of
>> duplicate code. Here's a patch to demonstrate what I'm talking about.
>>
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     ANU Supercomputer Facility
    tim.burgess@anu.edu.au           and APAC National Facility
    Phone: +61 2 6125 1431           Leonard Huxley Bldg (No. 56)
    Fax:   +61 2 6125 8199           Australian National University
                                     Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
   "Money can buy bandwidth, but latency is forever" -- John Mashey
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Multipath target does not shift block offset?
  2005-02-12  4:45 Multipath target does not shift block offset? Tim Burgess
  2005-02-14  1:42 ` block offset shift, mirroring bug resolved? Tim Burgess
@ 2005-02-16 16:02 ` Kevin Corry
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Corry @ 2005-02-16 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dm-devel

On Fri February 11 2005 10:45 pm, Tim Burgess wrote:
> Re the patch from Kevin:
>
> there looks like there is another reference to ti->begin in dm-raid1.c
> that the patch does not remove (in do_write).  I wasn't sure whether to
> leave it there or not, since you were talking about making each target
> unaware of its position within the overall mapped device...?

Oops. You're right, there are some other occurrances of ti->begin in the 
target modules that I missed in my previous patch. I accidentally only 
reviewing the mapping code. But dm-crypt and dm-raid1 each have code in their 
workqueue routines that used that field as well. Here's a new version of last 
week's patch with the two extra fixes.

And now that I think about it, we may want to make a similar patch for the 2.4 
version of DM. I'll try to write one up a little later.

-- 
Kevin Corry
kevcorry@us.ibm.com
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc/
http://evms.sourceforge.net/


--- diff/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c 2005-02-10 13:15:17.000000000 -0600
+++ source/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c 2005-02-16 09:51:42.211358152 -0600
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@
  int r;
 
  crypt_convert_init(cc, &ctx, io->bio, io->bio,
-                    io->bio->bi_sector - io->target->begin, 0);
+                    io->bio->bi_sector, 0);
  r = crypt_convert(cc, &ctx);
 
  dec_pending(io, r);
@@ -808,7 +808,7 @@
  struct convert_context ctx;
  struct bio *clone;
  unsigned int remaining = bio->bi_size;
- sector_t sector = bio->bi_sector - ti->begin;
+ sector_t sector = bio->bi_sector;
  unsigned int bvec_idx = 0;
 
  io->target = ti;
--- diff/drivers/md/dm-flakey.c 2005-02-10 13:15:17.000000000 -0600
+++ source/drivers/md/dm-flakey.c 2005-02-10 13:06:25.000000000 -0600
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
 
  else {
   bio->bi_bdev = f->dev->bdev;
-  bio->bi_sector = f->start + (bio->bi_sector - ti->begin);
+  bio->bi_sector += f->start;
  }
 
  return 1;
--- diff/drivers/md/dm-linear.c 2005-02-10 13:15:17.000000000 -0600
+++ source/drivers/md/dm-linear.c 2005-02-10 13:07:53.000000000 -0600
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
  struct linear_c *lc = (struct linear_c *) ti->private;
 
  bio->bi_bdev = lc->dev->bdev;
- bio->bi_sector = lc->start + (bio->bi_sector - ti->begin);
+ bio->bi_sector += lc->start;
 
  return 1;
 }
--- diff/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c 2005-02-10 13:15:17.000000000 -0600
+++ source/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c 2005-02-16 09:52:51.626805400 -0600
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@
 static void map_bio(struct mirror_set *ms, struct mirror *m, struct bio *bio)
 {
  bio->bi_bdev = m->dev->bdev;
- bio->bi_sector = m->offset + (bio->bi_sector - ms->ti->begin);
+ bio->bi_sector += m->offset;
 }
 
 static void do_reads(struct mirror_set *ms, struct bio_list *reads)
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@
   m = ms->mirror + i;
 
   io[i].bdev = m->dev->bdev;
-  io[i].sector = m->offset + (bio->bi_sector - ms->ti->begin);
+  io[i].sector = m->offset + bio->bi_sector;
   io[i].count = bio->bi_size >> 9;
  }
 
--- diff/drivers/md/dm-stripe.c 2005-02-10 13:15:17.000000000 -0600
+++ source/drivers/md/dm-stripe.c 2005-02-10 13:13:50.000000000 -0600
@@ -172,13 +172,12 @@
 {
  struct stripe_c *sc = (struct stripe_c *) ti->private;
 
- sector_t offset = bio->bi_sector - ti->begin;
- sector_t chunk = offset >> sc->chunk_shift;
+ sector_t chunk = bio->bi_sector >> sc->chunk_shift;
  uint32_t stripe = do_div(chunk, sc->stripes);
 
  bio->bi_bdev = sc->stripe[stripe].dev->bdev;
  bio->bi_sector = sc->stripe[stripe].physical_start +
-     (chunk << sc->chunk_shift) + (offset & sc->chunk_mask);
+     (chunk << sc->chunk_shift) + (bio->bi_sector & sc->chunk_mask);
  return 1;
 }
 
--- diff/drivers/md/dm.c 2005-02-10 13:15:17.000000000 -0600
+++ source/drivers/md/dm.c 2005-02-10 13:04:25.000000000 -0600
@@ -366,6 +366,7 @@
   * this io.
   */
  atomic_inc(&tio->io->io_count);
+ clone->bi_sector -= ti->begin;
  r = ti->type->map(ti, clone, &tio->info);
  if (r > 0)
   /* the bio has been remapped so dispatch it */

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-16 16:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-12  4:45 Multipath target does not shift block offset? Tim Burgess
2005-02-14  1:42 ` block offset shift, mirroring bug resolved? Tim Burgess
2005-02-16 16:02 ` Multipath target does not shift block offset? Kevin Corry

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.