All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: Xen and Vanderpool
@ 2005-02-17 14:56 Nakajima, Jun
  2005-02-17 15:30 ` Dave Feustel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2005-02-17 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dfeustel, xen-devel; +Cc: Steven Hand

Dave Feustel wrote:
> 
> Is the Vanderpool-based VM monitor code OS-specific or will the code
> that you have run Linux with work for other operating systems?
> 

The VT-based VM monitor code should _not_ be OS-specific, but should be
written to virulize a machine. As we enhance the capabilities in the
monitor, it should work for other operating systems. However, validation
or support is a different thing.

Jun


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id\x14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Xen and Vanderpool
@ 2005-02-16 15:13 Nakajima, Jun
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nakajima, Jun @ 2005-02-16 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jean-paul.pigache, Steven Hand; +Cc: xen-devel

BTW, docs/misc/VMX_changes.txt would answer such questions.

Jun
________________________________________
From: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of
jean-paul.pigache@bull.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:09 AM
To: Steven Hand
Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen and Vanderpool


Steve, 

I have a couple of questions about the support of Vanderpool by Xen : 

"Yes - works just fine. We can currently support an unmodified 
Linux kernel with fully virtualized devices, etc." 

I assume that for the virtualized devices you are using the same
Front-End device drivers as the current ones. Correct ? 

The work necessary to take benefit of the Vanderpool Technology should
be located in the Xen hypervisor. 
Does this require a brand new development or only some changes to the
current hypervisor ? 

Will most of these changes be compatible for the support of Vanderpool
on IA64 or will the work have to be done twice (for IA32 then for IA64)
? 
Regards 
Jean-Paul 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id\x14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Xen and Vanderpool
@ 2005-02-16 15:08 jean-paul.pigache
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jean-paul.pigache @ 2005-02-16 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Hand; +Cc: xen-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 681 bytes --]

Steve,

I have a couple of questions about the support of Vanderpool by Xen :

"Yes - works just fine. We can currently support an unmodified 
Linux kernel with fully virtualized devices, etc."

I assume that for the virtualized devices you are using the same Front-End 
device drivers as the current ones. Correct ?

The work necessary to take benefit of the Vanderpool Technology should be 
located in the Xen hypervisor.
Does this require a brand new development or only some changes to the 
current hypervisor ?

Will most of these changes be compatible for the support of Vanderpool on 
IA64 or will the work have to be done twice (for IA32 then for IA64) ?
Regards
Jean-Paul

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1055 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Xen and Vanderpool
@ 2005-02-16 14:44 Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
  2005-02-16 15:43 ` Steven Hand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh @ 2005-02-16 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Hand; +Cc: xen-devel

Are you running on a Vanderpool SDV or the real hardware itself? How
about Windows XP and W3K Server? Is there any work being done to get
them running on Xen with VT-x?

Aravindh

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Steven Hand
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:39 AM
To: dfeustel@mindspring.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Steven.Hand@cl.cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen and Vanderpool


>Has any testing of Xen using Vanderpool Technology been done?

Yes - works just fine. We can currently support an unmodified 
Linux kernel with fully virtualized devices, etc. 

YMMV getting your hands on a VT-x box though - they're not 
widely available just yet. 


cheers,

S.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id\x14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <dfeustel@verizon.net>]

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-17 15:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <mailman.1108566633.9033@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
2005-02-16 22:58 ` Xen and Vanderpool Arun Sharma
2005-02-17 14:56 Nakajima, Jun
2005-02-17 15:30 ` Dave Feustel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-16 15:13 Nakajima, Jun
2005-02-16 15:08 jean-paul.pigache
2005-02-16 14:44 Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
2005-02-16 15:43 ` Steven Hand
     [not found] <dfeustel@verizon.net>
2005-02-15 21:32 ` Dave Feustel
2005-02-16  8:39   ` Steven Hand
2005-02-16 11:09     ` Dave Feustel
2005-02-16 11:24       ` Steven Hand
2005-02-16 11:58         ` Dave Feustel

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.