new reiser4progs?

new reiser4progs?

[Ookhoi]

Hello all,

Are new reiser4progs available? I can only find 1.0.3 as newest,
but that version is august 2004.

It seems a newer version is provided to Simon, but in a private
mail, as I can't find that part of the thread in the archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/reiserfs-list@namesys.com/msg16804.html

I have the same problem described in that thread btw:
http://www.mail-archive.com/reiserfs-list@namesys.com/msg16785.html

The thread starts here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/reiserfs-list@namesys.com/msg16777.html

I get segmentation fault with --check of --build-sb,
and illegal instruction with --build-fs

Kernel is 2.6.11-rc3-mm2.

I'll read the archives so please reply to the list. Thanks in advance.

With kind regards, Sander

Re: new reiser4progs?

[Vitaly Fertman]

On Friday 18 February 2005 11:31, Ookhoi wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Are new reiser4progs available? I can only find 1.0.3 as newest,
> but that version is august 2004.

I have been about to release it for some time, but new problems 
stoped me every time.

> It seems a newer version is provided to Simon, but in a private
> mail, as I can't find that part of the thread in the archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/reiserfs-list@namesys.com/msg16804.html
>
> I have the same problem described in that thread btw:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/reiserfs-list@namesys.com/msg16785.html
>
> The thread starts here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/reiserfs-list@namesys.com/msg16777.html
>
> I get segmentation fault with --check of --build-sb,
> and illegal instruction with --build-fs

ok, I will release next version today or tomorrow and will see if it helps.

> Kernel is 2.6.11-rc3-mm2.
>
> I'll read the archives so please reply to the list. Thanks in advance.
>
> With kind regards, Sander

-- 
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: new reiser4progs?

[Ookhoi]

On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:19:59PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2005 11:31, Ookhoi wrote:
> > Are new reiser4progs available? I can only find 1.0.3 as newest,
> > but that version is august 2004.
> 
> I have been about to release it for some time, but new problems 
> stoped me every time.

I would love to try it.

> > I get segmentation fault with --check of --build-sb,
> > and illegal instruction with --build-fs
> 
> ok, I will release next version today or tomorrow and will see
> if it helps.

If it is not too unconvenient for you to release it today,
that would make me a happy person. Of course I managed to
get the fs bellyup the day before I hop on a plane :-)
I hope a newer fsck.reiser4 prevents a time consuming reinstall.

Thanks a lot for Reiserfs.

With kind regards, Sander

Re: new reiser4progs?

[Vitaly Fertman]

On Friday 18 February 2005 17:08, Ookhoi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:19:59PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > On Friday 18 February 2005 11:31, Ookhoi wrote:
> > > Are new reiser4progs available? I can only find 1.0.3 as newest,
> > > but that version is august 2004.
> >
> > I have been about to release it for some time, but new problems
> > stoped me every time.
>
> I would love to try it.
>
> > > I get segmentation fault with --check of --build-sb,
> > > and illegal instruction with --build-fs
> >
> > ok, I will release next version today or tomorrow and will see
> > if it helps.
>
> If it is not too unconvenient for you to release it today,
> that would make me a happy person. Of course I managed to
> get the fs bellyup the day before I hop on a plane :-)
> I hope a newer fsck.reiser4 prevents a time consuming reinstall.

testing a release candidate before releasing.
the amount of time needed depends on the amount of problems
appeared, if debugging/fixing/bugfix testing is need, etc.

-- 
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: new reiser4progs?

[Christian]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> testing a release candidate before releasing.
> the amount of time needed depends on the amount of problems
> appeared, if debugging/fixing/bugfix testing is need, etc.

would it be an option to publish daily (nightly) builds, along with a big.
fat UNTESTED warning? it could be done via scripts and even if it does not
build one day or the other - users would notice that and could report.

thanks,
Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #88:

Boss' kid fucked up the machine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCFhsmC/PVm5+NVoYRAnoJAJsFDRGMwm4B6cJcSvKse9vlO0D+KACg74Vx
bA/rsyNUcZk5SPplUFkDXYs=
=41fL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: new reiser4progs?

[David Masover]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Christian wrote:
| Vitaly Fertman wrote:
|
|>>testing a release candidate before releasing.
|>>the amount of time needed depends on the amount of problems
|>>appeared, if debugging/fixing/bugfix testing is need, etc.
|
|
| would it be an option to publish daily (nightly) builds, along with a big.
| fat UNTESTED warning? it could be done via scripts and even if it does not
| build one day or the other - users would notice that and could report.

It'd also be nice to have alpha/beta/prerelease.  Some users have
debuggers and testing suites, too.

That would give a full spectrum of versions, from CVS all the way down
to mission-critical-ready.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=2HN+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: new reiser4progs?

[Hans Reiser]

What is the time since the last update was released, and are there bugs 
whose fixes are possessed only by Vitaly at this time?

Hans

Christian wrote:

> Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>
> >testing a release candidate before releasing.
> >the amount of time needed depends on the amount of problems
> >appeared, if debugging/fixing/bugfix testing is need, etc.
>
>
> would it be an option to publish daily (nightly) builds, along with a big.
> fat UNTESTED warning? it could be done via scripts and even if it does not
> build one day or the other - users would notice that and could report.
>
> thanks,
> Christian.
> --
> BOFH excuse #88:
>
> Boss' kid fucked up the machine

Re: new reiser4progs?

[Vitaly Fertman]

On Friday 18 February 2005 17:08, Ookhoi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:19:59PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > On Friday 18 February 2005 11:31, Ookhoi wrote:
> > > Are new reiser4progs available? I can only find 1.0.3 as newest,
> > > but that version is august 2004.

wait, 1.0.3 was released in december 2004.

-- 
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: new reiser4progs?

[Ookhoi]

On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:49:12PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2005 17:08, Ookhoi wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:19:59PM +0300, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 February 2005 11:31, Ookhoi wrote:
> > > > Are new reiser4progs available? I can only find 1.0.3 as newest,
> > > > but that version is august 2004.
> 
> wait, 1.0.3 was released in december 2004.

You are right, I'm sorry for the mistake.

The LATEST_REISER4PROGS_IS link on ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4progs/
is from 13-8-2004, but indeed version 1.0.3 is from 9-12-2004