[PATCH 2.6 0/8]: Netfilter Update

[PATCH 2.6 0/8]: Netfilter Update

[Patrick McHardy]

Hi Dave,

following are a couple of netfilter fixes for 2.6. The patches
are based on your net-2.6 tree, but also apply cleanly to your
2.6.12 tree. Unfortunately no bitkeeper tree this time because
someone messed up our firewall rules.


<ariel:blueslice.com>:
   o [NETFILTER]: SCTP conntrack: fix association restart

<mstjohns:mindspring.com>:
   o [NETFILTER]: fix ip6_queue inefficiencies

Andi Kleen:
   o [NETFILTER]: Reduce netfilter memory use on MP systems

Jozsef Kadlecsik:
   o [NETFILTER]: Fix multiple problems with TCP window tracking

Patrick McHardy:
   o [NETFILTER]: Don't insist on ICMP errors carrying 8 byte of 
protocol header
   o [NETFILTER]: Fix /proc/net/ip_conntrack seq_file operations
   o [NETFILTER]: Use num_possible_cpus instead of NR_CPUS in 
{ip6_,arp_,eb}tables
   o [NETFILTER]: Use correct types in seq_printf calls

Re: [PATCH 2.6 0/8]: Netfilter Update

[Patrick McHardy]

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> following are a couple of netfilter fixes for 2.6. The patches
> are based on your net-2.6 tree, but also apply cleanly to your
> 2.6.12 tree. Unfortunately no bitkeeper tree this time because
> someone messed up our firewall rules.

I moved it to a different port, now both trees should be pullable at:

bk://212.42.230.204:994/nf-2.4
bk://212.42.230.204:994/nf-2.6

Regards
Patrick

Re: [PATCH 2.6 0/8]: Netfilter Update

[David S. Miller]

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:16:18 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:

> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > following are a couple of netfilter fixes for 2.6. The patches
> > are based on your net-2.6 tree, but also apply cleanly to your
> > 2.6.12 tree. Unfortunately no bitkeeper tree this time because
> > someone messed up our firewall rules.
> 
> I moved it to a different port, now both trees should be pullable at:
> 
> bk://212.42.230.204:994/nf-2.4
> bk://212.42.230.204:994/nf-2.6

Both pulled, thanks Patrick.