Re: [KJ] [PATCH 1/3] unified spinlock initialization

Re: [KJ] [PATCH 1/3] unified spinlock initialization

[Tobias Klauser]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 404 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:44:26PM +0530, Amit Gud wrote:
>    Unify the spinlock initialization as far as possible.
> 
>    Do consider applying.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Gud <gud@eth.net>
> 
> --- ../kernels/linux-2.6.11/include/linux/wait.h        2005-03-10 12:03:31.000000000 +0530
> +++ kj-2.6.11/include/linux/wait.h      2005-03-11 19:29:44.381918880 +0530

This patch cannot be applied with -p1

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

[KJ] [PATCH 1/3] unified spinlock initialization

[Amit Gud]

Hi,

    Unify the spinlock initialization as far as possible.

    Do consider applying.

Signed-off-by: Amit Gud <gud@eth.net>

--- ../kernels/linux-2.6.11/include/linux/wait.h        2005-03-10 
12:03:31.000000000 +0530
+++ kj-2.6.11/include/linux/wait.h      2005-03-11 19:29:44.381918880 +0530
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ typedef struct __wait_queue_head wait_qu

 static inline void init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q)
 {
-       q->lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+       spin_lock_init(&q->lock);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->task_list);
 }


_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors