All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev)
@ 2005-03-15  9:58 Andrey Volkov
  2005-03-15 11:04 ` Benedikt Spranger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Volkov @ 2005-03-15  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hello, all

I look through code of exist CANbus drivers, and have, may be strange, 
next question:

Anyone could told me, why everyone, who wrote CANbus driver (peak, 
kvaser etc) always use char dev, but not netdev for it? May be exist 
some global pitfall, which I couldn't see, which prevent to use netdev?

-- 
Regards
Andrey Volkov.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev)
  2005-03-15  9:58 RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev) Andrey Volkov
@ 2005-03-15 11:04 ` Benedikt Spranger
  2005-03-15 11:52   ` Andrey Volkov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benedikt Spranger @ 2005-03-15 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrey Volkov; +Cc: linux-kernel


> Anyone could told me, why everyone, who wrote CANbus driver (peak, 
> kvaser etc) always use char dev, but not netdev for it? May be exist 
> some global pitfall, which I couldn't see, which prevent to use netdev?

Maybe you try out:
http://www.linutronix.de/data/linux-2.6.11-can.diff

Bene


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev)
  2005-03-15 11:04 ` Benedikt Spranger
@ 2005-03-15 11:52   ` Andrey Volkov
  2005-03-15 18:39     ` Robert Schwebel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Volkov @ 2005-03-15 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benedikt Spranger; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hi Benedikt,

Yes, thanks, very close to what about I thinking :),
but are you measure overhead of netdev (it disturb me)?

Andrey

Benedikt Spranger wrote:
>>Anyone could told me, why everyone, who wrote CANbus driver (peak, 
>>kvaser etc) always use char dev, but not netdev for it? May be exist 
>>some global pitfall, which I couldn't see, which prevent to use netdev?
> 
> 
> Maybe you try out:
> http://www.linutronix.de/data/linux-2.6.11-can.diff
> 
> Bene
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev)
  2005-03-15 11:52   ` Andrey Volkov
@ 2005-03-15 18:39     ` Robert Schwebel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Schwebel @ 2005-03-15 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrey Volkov; +Cc: Benedikt Spranger, linux-kernel

On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:52:39PM +0300, Andrey Volkov wrote:
> Benedikt Spranger wrote:
> >>Anyone could told me, why everyone, who wrote CANbus driver (peak, 
> >>kvaser etc) always use char dev, but not netdev for it? May be exist 
> >>some global pitfall, which I couldn't see, which prevent to use netdev?
> >
> >
> >Maybe you try out:
> >http://www.linutronix.de/data/linux-2.6.11-can.diff

We have a newer version of this patch which we are currently making
ready for upstream. 

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-15 18:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-15  9:58 RFC: CANbus subsytem for 2.6 kernel (char or netdev) Andrey Volkov
2005-03-15 11:04 ` Benedikt Spranger
2005-03-15 11:52   ` Andrey Volkov
2005-03-15 18:39     ` Robert Schwebel

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.