From: Nate Lawson <nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: IDE failure on ACPI resume
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:08:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <423A1BED.1010608@root.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111104154.8136.179.camel@tyrosine>
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 12:34 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
>>Very interesting. I was hoping to someday have _GTF et al implemented
>>but the ATA knowledge required was above my head. I also strongly
>>suspected that the info published by _GTF would likely be invalid. Does
>>Windows actually use that method or just hardcoded ATA initialization?
>
> I believe that Windows does use the _GTF methods.
You are correct. A quick scan of my w2k drivers shows atapi.sys uses
the _GTF, _GTM, and _STM methods.
--
Nate
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ACPI] IDE failure on ACPI resume
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:08:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <423A1BED.1010608@root.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111104154.8136.179.camel@tyrosine>
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 12:34 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
>>Very interesting. I was hoping to someday have _GTF et al implemented
>>but the ATA knowledge required was above my head. I also strongly
>>suspected that the info published by _GTF would likely be invalid. Does
>>Windows actually use that method or just hardcoded ATA initialization?
>
> I believe that Windows does use the _GTF methods.
You are correct. A quick scan of my w2k drivers shows atapi.sys uses
the _GTF, _GTM, and _STM methods.
--
Nate
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-18 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-13 19:14 IDE failure on ACPI resume Matthew Garrett
2005-03-13 19:14 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-03-14 4:53 ` Nate Lawson
2005-03-14 4:53 ` [ACPI] " Nate Lawson
2005-03-17 15:10 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-03-17 20:34 ` Nate Lawson
[not found] ` <4239E9BA.7050105-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org>
2005-03-18 0:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-03-18 0:02 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Garrett
2005-03-18 0:08 ` Nate Lawson [this message]
2005-03-18 0:08 ` Nate Lawson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=423A1BED.1010608@root.org \
--to=nate-y6vguytwhu0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.