* [patch 2/3] hd eliminate bad section references
@ 2005-04-04 18:11 maximilian attems
2005-04-04 22:12 ` Randy.Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: maximilian attems @ 2005-04-04 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lkml; +Cc: Randy.Dunlap, akpm
Fix hd section references:
make parse_hd_setup() __init
Error: ./drivers/ide/legacy/hd.o .text refers to 00000943 R_386_PC32
.init.text
Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-bk5/drivers/ide/legacy/hd.c.orig 2005-04-04 18:39:04.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-bk5/drivers/ide/legacy/hd.c 2005-04-04 19:02:57.908576221 +0200
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@
goto out;
}
-static int parse_hd_setup (char *line) {
+static int __init parse_hd_setup (char *line) {
int ints[6];
(void) get_options(line, ARRAY_SIZE(ints), ints);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 2/3] hd eliminate bad section references 2005-04-04 18:11 [patch 2/3] hd eliminate bad section references maximilian attems @ 2005-04-04 22:12 ` Randy.Dunlap 2005-04-04 23:05 ` maximilian attems 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2005-04-04 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: maximilian attems; +Cc: lkml, akpm, B.Zolnierkiewicz, rusty maximilian attems wrote: > Fix hd section references: > make parse_hd_setup() __init > > Error: ./drivers/ide/legacy/hd.o .text refers to 00000943 R_386_PC32 > .init.text > > Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <janitor@sternwelten.at> > > > --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-bk5/drivers/ide/legacy/hd.c.orig 2005-04-04 18:39:04.000000000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-bk5/drivers/ide/legacy/hd.c 2005-04-04 19:02:57.908576221 +0200 > @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ > goto out; > } > > -static int parse_hd_setup (char *line) { > +static int __init parse_hd_setup (char *line) { > int ints[6]; > > (void) get_options(line, ARRAY_SIZE(ints), ints); This one is fairly interesting and needs some resolution by someone who knows.... On the surface, the patch is correct. Rusty, can you explain when __setup functions are called relative to in-kernel init functions? or put another way, can a __setup function safely call in __init function? Here's the function in question: static int parse_hd_setup (char *line) { int ints[6]; (void) get_options(line, ARRAY_SIZE(ints), ints); hd_setup(NULL, ints); return 1; } __setup("hd=", parse_hd_setup); Should we make parse_hd_setup() __init, or make hd_setup() non-__init, or something else? {time passes, he looks] OK, I looked at include/linux/init.h. From what I can see there, __setup() causes an .init.setup section to be emitted, so marking __setup() function as __init would make sense. I think that this patch is good. Thanks. -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 2/3] hd eliminate bad section references 2005-04-04 22:12 ` Randy.Dunlap @ 2005-04-04 23:05 ` maximilian attems 2005-04-05 0:00 ` Rusty Russell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: maximilian attems @ 2005-04-04 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy.Dunlap; +Cc: lkml, akpm, B.Zolnierkiewicz, rusty On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > >-static int parse_hd_setup (char *line) { > >+static int __init parse_hd_setup (char *line) { .. > This one is fairly interesting and needs some resolution by someone > who knows.... thanks a lot for your quick and profund feedback. > On the surface, the patch is correct. > > Rusty, can you explain when __setup functions are called relative > to in-kernel init functions? or put another way, can a __setup > function safely call in __init function? > > Here's the function in question: > > static int parse_hd_setup (char *line) { > int ints[6]; > > (void) get_options(line, ARRAY_SIZE(ints), ints); > hd_setup(NULL, ints); > > return 1; > } > __setup("hd=", parse_hd_setup); > > > > Should we make parse_hd_setup() __init, > or make hd_setup() non-__init, or something else? > > {time passes, he looks] > > OK, I looked at include/linux/init.h. From what I can see > there, __setup() causes an .init.setup section to be emitted, > so marking __setup() function as __init would make sense. > I think that this patch is good. i saw that ide_setup() is __init as a bunch of lots others. yes init.h confirms that. :) -- maks kernel janitor http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 2/3] hd eliminate bad section references 2005-04-04 23:05 ` maximilian attems @ 2005-04-05 0:00 ` Rusty Russell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Rusty Russell @ 2005-04-05 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: maximilian attems Cc: Randy.Dunlap, lkml - Kernel Mailing List, akpm, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:05 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > Rusty, can you explain when __setup functions are called relative > > to in-kernel init functions? or put another way, can a __setup > > function safely call in __init function? Yes. init sections are discarded just before "init" is exec'ed, ie. at the last moment in the boot process. __setup() functions are called at the same time as module_param() parsing, which is all done before the various initcall/module_init calls. Cheers, Rusty. -- A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-05 0:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-04-04 18:11 [patch 2/3] hd eliminate bad section references maximilian attems 2005-04-04 22:12 ` Randy.Dunlap 2005-04-04 23:05 ` maximilian attems 2005-04-05 0:00 ` Rusty Russell
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.