* Idea: Small Address Spaces
@ 2005-04-04 23:55 Jacob Gorm Hansen
2005-04-06 3:52 ` Jacob Gorm Hansen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Gorm Hansen @ 2005-04-04 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
hi,
in the cases where users (like me) wish to run Xen with MPI on Ethernets
or similar, and don't care too much about driver isolation, I am
thinking of trying to apply Jochen Liedtke's old 'small address spaces'
hack, to see if I can improve domU I/O performance.
My idea is to reserve some additional virtual address space below Xen,
e.g. at 0xF0000000, and map the kernel part of dom0* there permanently.
The user space part of dom0 I would map as normal from 0 - 0xC0000000,
to avoid relinking dom0 applications. I would use the segments to keep
the domUs below 0xF0000000. In this way, TLB flushes should only be
necessary when dom0 exits to user space, not when handling interrupts or
when domUs are asking for I/O.
Ideally, I would move dom0 to ring0 to save the cost of switching from
Xen to dom0, but I have no idea how much trouble this will cause.
I have been working a bit on this, and so far I have only managed to
move dom0 to its new location, and to map the 0xF0000000 - 0xFC000000
range into the top of domU pgds instead of changing the cr3 (page table
base) register. I have managed to break a lot of things, I see that as a
good sign ;-)
I know this loses driver isolation, but I would argue that if it can be
done relatively cleanly, and if it yields any performance improvements,
a significant percentage of users would be willing to make that
tradeoff. Naturally, this would be a (compile or run-time) option, not
the default behavior.
Comments are welcome, now is the time to yell stop ;-)
Jacob
* This could probably be made to work with multiple IDDs as well,
treating the 0xF0000000 slot as a cache of the last run driver-domain
rather than as a permanent mapping.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Idea: Small Address Spaces
2005-04-04 23:55 Idea: Small Address Spaces Jacob Gorm Hansen
@ 2005-04-06 3:52 ` Jacob Gorm Hansen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Gorm Hansen @ 2005-04-06 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote:
> hi,
>
> in the cases where users (like me) wish to run Xen with MPI on Ethernets
> or similar, and don't care too much about driver isolation, I am
> thinking of trying to apply Jochen Liedtke's old 'small address spaces'
> hack, to see if I can improve domU I/O performance.
>
> My idea is to reserve some additional virtual address space below Xen,
> e.g. at 0xF0000000, and map the kernel part of dom0* there permanently.
> The user space part of dom0 I would map as normal from 0 - 0xC0000000,
> to avoid relinking dom0 applications. I would use the segments to keep
> the domUs below 0xF0000000. In this way, TLB flushes should only be
> necessary when dom0 exits to user space, not when handling interrupts or
> when domUs are asking for I/O.
Hmmm turns out this is pretty hard to do without relinking userspace, as
naturally the linux0 likes to peek and poke user-space addresses itself,
as does Xen.
I guess what I could do (my original plan actually, before I got too
clever for my own good), would be to squeeze userspace into the
permanent mapping as well, and then have a relinked busybox or similar
in there, instead of a full, standard Linux disto.
Jacob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-06 3:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-04 23:55 Idea: Small Address Spaces Jacob Gorm Hansen
2005-04-06 3:52 ` Jacob Gorm Hansen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.