* irc
@ 2005-03-30 20:08 Jody Belka
2005-03-30 20:22 ` [Xen-users] irc Christopher S. Aker
2005-03-30 20:57 ` irc Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jody Belka @ 2005-03-30 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel, xen-users
Hi,
If anyone is interested, i've registered #xen-users and #xen-devel on
freenode, so pop by if you feel like it.
J
--
Jody Belka
knew (at) pimb (dot) org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xen-users] irc
2005-03-30 20:08 irc Jody Belka
@ 2005-03-30 20:22 ` Christopher S. Aker
2005-03-30 20:57 ` irc Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christopher S. Aker @ 2005-03-30 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jody Belka, xen-devel; +Cc: xen-users
> If anyone is interested, i've registered #xen-users and #xen-devel on
> freenode, so pop by if you feel like it.
There's also a burgeoning #xen channel on irc.oftc.net, the "Open and Free Technology
Community" network.
-Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: irc
2005-03-30 20:08 irc Jody Belka
2005-03-30 20:22 ` [Xen-users] irc Christopher S. Aker
@ 2005-03-30 20:57 ` Rik van Riel
2005-04-05 20:03 ` RTC going backwards? Rob Gardner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2005-03-30 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jody Belka; +Cc: xen-devel, xen-users
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Jody Belka wrote:
> If anyone is interested, i've registered #xen-users and #xen-devel on
> freenode, so pop by if you feel like it.
Oh, we've been hanging out on #xen on OFTC for the last
weeks ;)
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RTC going backwards?
2005-03-30 20:57 ` irc Rik van Riel
@ 2005-04-05 20:03 ` Rob Gardner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rob Gardner @ 2005-04-05 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Is it possible to call NOW() in xen, and then sometime later call it
again and get a slightly smaller value (ie, by a few thousand ns)? Is
there something that makes small corrections to the rtc once in a while?
I'm trying to track down a bug in some code I'm developing and it looks
like time really does go backwards sometimes.
Rob Gardner
HP
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: RTC going backwards?
@ 2005-04-05 20:20 Ian Pratt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pratt @ 2005-04-05 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Gardner, xen-devel
> Is it possible to call NOW() in xen, and then sometime later
> call it again and get a slightly smaller value (ie, by a few
> thousand ns)? Is there something that makes small corrections
> to the rtc once in a while?
> I'm trying to track down a bug in some code I'm developing
> and it looks like time really does go backwards sometimes.
NOW() uses get_s_time (system time), which should always be greater or
equal to the previous value.
If you're running a domain 0 with xntpd, then Xen's wall clock time time
(as opposed to system time) can indeed go backwards if domain 0 pushes
down adjustments to it.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-05 20:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-30 20:08 irc Jody Belka
2005-03-30 20:22 ` [Xen-users] irc Christopher S. Aker
2005-03-30 20:57 ` irc Rik van Riel
2005-04-05 20:03 ` RTC going backwards? Rob Gardner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-05 20:20 Ian Pratt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.