From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jonas Berlin <xkr47@outerspace.dyndns.org>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix NAT TCP sequence adjustment
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:01:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <426830BF.7020107@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4267AB2A.9050604@outerspace.dyndns.org>
Jonas Berlin wrote:
> Would there be something to lose in using INT_MAX/2 (or something)
> instead of INT_MAX as a base for the additions? And/or maybe have a bit
> of space between them in case something new pops up later? Of course you
> _can_ change them later, but there's always the risk that some 3rd party
> software out there basing themselves on a standard kernel including
> these additions, so I think it would be nice not to have to change them
> later..
These hooks should be last. If anyone has a valid reason to call
something after them they can post their code to the list and
we can change it.
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-21 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-02 20:24 [PATCH] Fix NAT TCP sequence adjustment Phil Oester
2005-04-03 12:26 ` Milos Wimmer
2005-04-03 19:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-03 23:53 ` Phil Oester
2005-04-04 4:40 ` Phil Oester
2005-04-04 8:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-04 20:47 ` Phil Oester
2005-04-05 7:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-05 13:33 ` Patch lifetime " Amin Azez
2005-04-10 20:49 ` Harald Welte
2005-04-06 4:48 ` Phil Oester
2005-04-18 1:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-19 0:58 ` Phil Oester
2005-04-20 15:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-20 15:53 ` Phil Oester
2005-04-20 16:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-20 17:24 ` Phil Oester
2005-04-20 17:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-20 18:25 ` Phil Oester
2005-04-20 21:39 ` Martijn Lievaart
2005-04-21 1:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-21 1:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-21 12:31 ` Milos Wimmer
2005-04-21 12:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-21 13:31 ` Jonas Berlin
2005-04-21 23:01 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-04-27 0:44 ` Rusty Russell
2005-04-27 10:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-31 9:17 ` Rusty Russell
2005-05-31 13:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-31 13:48 ` Rusty Russell
2005-05-31 14:35 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=426830BF.7020107@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=xkr47@outerspace.dyndns.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.