* [uml-devel] [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
@ 2005-05-09 23:10 ` Blaisorblade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-09 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, Bodo Stroesser
Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you merge
them soon, Andrew? Thanks.
The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start*
compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a
file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was
this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for
patches?
Also, I had marked some of the patches I sent as needing some staging time in
-mm (especially "uml: redo console locking"), while I had marked other ones
as needing immediate merge. Jeff instead has sent some "cleanup / groundwork
for future work" (which anyway were mostly trivial) together with some urgent
fixes.
Actually they aren't a problem (especially because UML has almost no support
for SMP) however this policy risks breaking things.
We had the exactly opposite problem for 2.6.10 release - some important fixes
which were sent by Jeff just before 2.6.10 release to be merged in it (but
which weren't explicitly marked as such) were merged in 2.6.10-mm1.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
@ 2005-05-09 23:10 ` Blaisorblade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-09 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, Bodo Stroesser
Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you merge
them soon, Andrew? Thanks.
The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start*
compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a
file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was
this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for
patches?
Also, I had marked some of the patches I sent as needing some staging time in
-mm (especially "uml: redo console locking"), while I had marked other ones
as needing immediate merge. Jeff instead has sent some "cleanup / groundwork
for future work" (which anyway were mostly trivial) together with some urgent
fixes.
Actually they aren't a problem (especially because UML has almost no support
for SMP) however this policy risks breaking things.
We had the exactly opposite problem for 2.6.10 release - some important fixes
which were sent by Jeff just before 2.6.10 release to be merged in it (but
which weren't explicitly marked as such) were merged in 2.6.10-mm1.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
2005-05-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2005-05-09 23:39 ` Blaisorblade
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-09 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 01:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you
> > merge them soon, Andrew? Thanks.
>
> Sure.
> > The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start*
> > compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a
> > file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was
> > this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for
> > patches?
> Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
> several weeks away from 2.6.12,
Several weeks away? Ok, that's nice to know, so we are not in a hurry
(especially since I'm totally busy). When I'll have time I'll flush out the
rest of what I have in my tree.
> so I figured there was plenty of time to
> get things fixed up - best to get it all flushed out and fix any fallout
> rather than hang around, given that UML seems to be still changing in
> fairly significant ways.
Ok, I had guessed we were near to the release instead.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
@ 2005-05-09 23:39 ` Blaisorblade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-09 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 01:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you
> > merge them soon, Andrew? Thanks.
>
> Sure.
> > The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start*
> > compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a
> > file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was
> > this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for
> > patches?
> Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
> several weeks away from 2.6.12,
Several weeks away? Ok, that's nice to know, so we are not in a hurry
(especially since I'm totally busy). When I'll have time I'll flush out the
rest of what I have in my tree.
> so I figured there was plenty of time to
> get things fixed up - best to get it all flushed out and fix any fallout
> rather than hang around, given that UML seems to be still changing in
> fairly significant ways.
Ok, I had guessed we were near to the release instead.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
2005-05-09 23:10 ` Blaisorblade
@ 2005-05-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-05-09 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you merge
> them soon, Andrew? Thanks.
Sure.
> The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start*
> compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a
> file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was
> this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for
> patches?
Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
several weeks away from 2.6.12, so I figured there was plenty of time to
get things fixed up - best to get it all flushed out and fix any fallout
rather than hang around, given that UML seems to be still changing in
fairly significant ways.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
@ 2005-05-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-05-09 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you merge
> them soon, Andrew? Thanks.
Sure.
> The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start*
> compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a
> file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was
> this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for
> patches?
Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
several weeks away from 2.6.12, so I figured there was plenty of time to
get things fixed up - best to get it all flushed out and fix any fallout
rather than hang around, given that UML seems to be still changing in
fairly significant ways.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
2005-05-09 23:39 ` Blaisorblade
@ 2005-05-10 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-05-10 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
> > several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> Several weeks away?
Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots and
general SCM churn. Plus I have a boatload of bug reports to follow up on
here.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
@ 2005-05-10 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-05-10 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
> > several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> Several weeks away?
Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots and
general SCM churn. Plus I have a boatload of bug reports to follow up on
here.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
2005-05-10 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2005-05-10 10:17 ` Blaisorblade
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-10 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're
> > > maybe several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> >
> > Several weeks away?
>
> Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots
Is there a technical reason they've not been restored? I've kept forgetting to
request them.
> and
> general SCM churn.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
@ 2005-05-10 10:17 ` Blaisorblade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-10 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're
> > > maybe several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> >
> > Several weeks away?
>
> Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots
Is there a technical reason they've not been restored? I've kept forgetting to
request them.
> and
> general SCM churn.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
2005-05-10 10:17 ` Blaisorblade
@ 2005-05-10 10:42 ` Andrew Morton
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-05-10 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're
> > > > maybe several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> > >
> > > Several weeks away?
> >
> > Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots
>
> Is there a technical reason they've not been restored?
Nope. They started again five days ago.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12
@ 2005-05-10 10:42 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-05-10 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade; +Cc: jdike, linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel, bstroesser
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're
> > > > maybe several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> > >
> > > Several weeks away?
> >
> > Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots
>
> Is there a technical reason they've not been restored?
Nope. They started again five days ago.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org (was: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12)
2005-05-10 10:42 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2005-05-10 10:43 ` Blaisorblade
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-10 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: webmaster; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, user-mode-linux-devel
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 12:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > > > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had,
> > > > > we're maybe several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> > > >
> > > > Several weeks away?
> > >
> > > Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots
> >
> > Is there a technical reason they've not been restored?
> Nope. They started again five days ago.
Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
ones.
I just found
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by knowing
there were the snapshots somewhere.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org (was: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12)
@ 2005-05-10 10:43 ` Blaisorblade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-10 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: webmaster; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, user-mode-linux-devel
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 12:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 May 2005 02:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > > > > Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had,
> > > > > we're maybe several weeks away from 2.6.12,
> > > >
> > > > Several weeks away?
> > >
> > > Hope so. We lost a lot of testing due to lack of daily snapshots
> >
> > Is there a technical reason they've not been restored?
> Nope. They started again five days ago.
Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
ones.
I just found
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by knowing
there were the snapshots somewhere.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org
2005-05-10 10:43 ` Blaisorblade
@ 2005-05-10 16:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-05-10 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade
Cc: webmaster, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, user-mode-linux-devel
Blaisorblade wrote:
>
>>Nope. They started again five days ago.
>
> Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
> only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
> ones.
>
> I just found
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by knowing
> there were the snapshots somewhere.
It's because there is no snapshots against -rc4, simply because Linus is
on vacation and thus there hasn't been any changes since -rc4.
-hpa
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org
@ 2005-05-10 16:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-05-10 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Blaisorblade
Cc: webmaster, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, user-mode-linux-devel
Blaisorblade wrote:
>
>>Nope. They started again five days ago.
>
> Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
> only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
> ones.
>
> I just found
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by knowing
> there were the snapshots somewhere.
It's because there is no snapshots against -rc4, simply because Linus is
on vacation and thus there hasn't been any changes since -rc4.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org
2005-05-10 16:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2005-05-10 16:11 ` Lee Revell
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Lee Revell @ 2005-05-10 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Blaisorblade, webmaster, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton,
user-mode-linux-devel
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:03 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >
> >>Nope. They started again five days ago.
> >
> > Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
> > only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
> > ones.
> >
> > I just found
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by knowing
> > there were the snapshots somewhere.
>
> It's because there is no snapshots against -rc4, simply because Linus is
> on vacation and thus there hasn't been any changes since -rc4.
>
How about cleaning up the v2.6/testing directory?
[ ] ChangeLog-2.6.9-rc4 10-Oct-2004 22:15 115k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.11-rc5 24-Feb-2005 10:58 0k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc1 17-Mar-2005 20:41 0k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc2 04-Apr-2005 11:41 0k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc3 20-Apr-2005 19:21 0k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc4 07-May-2005 00:41 0k
[DIR] cset/ 04-Apr-2005 12:16 -
Lee
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org
@ 2005-05-10 16:11 ` Lee Revell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Lee Revell @ 2005-05-10 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Blaisorblade, webmaster, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton,
user-mode-linux-devel
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:03 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >
> >>Nope. They started again five days ago.
> >
> > Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
> > only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
> > ones.
> >
> > I just found
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by knowing
> > there were the snapshots somewhere.
>
> It's because there is no snapshots against -rc4, simply because Linus is
> on vacation and thus there hasn't been any changes since -rc4.
>
How about cleaning up the v2.6/testing directory?
[ ] ChangeLog-2.6.9-rc4 10-Oct-2004 22:15 115k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.11-rc5 24-Feb-2005 10:58 0k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc1 17-Mar-2005 20:41 0k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc2 04-Apr-2005 11:41 0k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc3 20-Apr-2005 19:21 0k
[ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc4 07-May-2005 00:41 0k
[DIR] cset/ 04-Apr-2005 12:16 -
Lee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org
2005-05-10 16:11 ` Lee Revell
@ 2005-05-10 21:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-05-10 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Revell
Cc: Blaisorblade, webmaster, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton,
user-mode-linux-devel
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:03 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>>Blaisorblade wrote:
>>
>>>>Nope. They started again five days ago.
>>>
>>>Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
>>>only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
>>>ones.
>>>
>>>I just found
>>>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by knowing
>>>there were the snapshots somewhere.
>>
>>It's because there is no snapshots against -rc4, simply because Linus is
>>on vacation and thus there hasn't been any changes since -rc4.
>>
>
>
> How about cleaning up the v2.6/testing directory?
>
> [ ] ChangeLog-2.6.9-rc4 10-Oct-2004 22:15 115k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.11-rc5 24-Feb-2005 10:58 0k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc1 17-Mar-2005 20:41 0k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc2 04-Apr-2005 11:41 0k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc3 20-Apr-2005 19:21 0k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc4 07-May-2005 00:41 0k
> [DIR] cset/ 04-Apr-2005 12:16 -
>
> Lee
Ask Linus.
-hpa
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org
@ 2005-05-10 21:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-05-10 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Revell
Cc: Blaisorblade, webmaster, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton,
user-mode-linux-devel
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:03 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>>Blaisorblade wrote:
>>
>>>>Nope. They started again five days ago.
>>>
>>>Would anybody restore the link from the main www.kernel.org/ page, then? I
>>>only see there (and in the finger banner) the 2.4 snapshots, not the 2.6
>>>ones.
>>>
>>>I just found
>>>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/, but only by knowing
>>>there were the snapshots somewhere.
>>
>>It's because there is no snapshots against -rc4, simply because Linus is
>>on vacation and thus there hasn't been any changes since -rc4.
>>
>
>
> How about cleaning up the v2.6/testing directory?
>
> [ ] ChangeLog-2.6.9-rc4 10-Oct-2004 22:15 115k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.11-rc5 24-Feb-2005 10:58 0k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc1 17-Mar-2005 20:41 0k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc2 04-Apr-2005 11:41 0k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc3 20-Apr-2005 19:21 0k
> [ ] LATEST-IS-2.6.12-rc4 07-May-2005 00:41 0k
> [DIR] cset/ 04-Apr-2005 12:16 -
>
> Lee
Ask Linus.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-10 21:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-09 23:10 [uml-devel] [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12 Blaisorblade
2005-05-09 23:10 ` Blaisorblade
2005-05-09 23:45 ` [uml-devel] " Andrew Morton
2005-05-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-09 23:39 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2005-05-09 23:39 ` Blaisorblade
2005-05-10 0:02 ` [uml-devel] " Andrew Morton
2005-05-10 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-10 10:17 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2005-05-10 10:17 ` Blaisorblade
2005-05-10 10:42 ` [uml-devel] " Andrew Morton
2005-05-10 10:42 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-10 10:43 ` Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org (was: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12) Blaisorblade
2005-05-10 10:43 ` Blaisorblade
2005-05-10 16:03 ` [uml-devel] Re: Restoring the link to snapshots on kernel.org H. Peter Anvin
2005-05-10 16:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-05-10 16:11 ` [uml-devel] " Lee Revell
2005-05-10 16:11 ` Lee Revell
2005-05-10 21:14 ` [uml-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2005-05-10 21:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.