From: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk, linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Subject: [PATCH][3/3] ondemand governor automatic downscaling
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:31:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4281FB3C.5090400@tremplin-utc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4281F837.5070608@tremplin-utc.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 671 bytes --]
This patch has been redone for latest snapshot. Very little differences
from before, use the usecs_to_jiffies() instead of the old
sampling_rate_in_HZ() and comments updated.
Eric
--
Here is a new policy for the ondemand governor. The modification
concerns the frequency downscaling. Instead of decreasing to a lower
frequency when the CPU usage is under 20%, this new policy automatically
scales to the optimal frequency. The optimal frequency being the lowest
frequency which provides enough power to not trigger the upscaling policy.
Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
--
[-- Attachment #2: ondemand-automatic-downscaling-2.6.11-20050511.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 5770 bytes --]
--- linux-2.6.11/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c.cpufreq-20050501-2 2005-05-11 13:32:14.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.11/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c 2005-05-11 14:06:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -34,13 +34,9 @@
*/
#define DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (80)
-#define MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (0)
+#define MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (10)
#define MAX_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (100)
-#define DEF_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD (20)
-#define MIN_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD (0)
-#define MAX_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD (100)
-
/*
* The polling frequency of this governor depends on the capability of
* the processor. Default polling frequency is 1000 times the transition
@@ -77,12 +73,10 @@ struct dbs_tuners {
unsigned int sampling_rate;
unsigned int sampling_down_factor;
unsigned int up_threshold;
- unsigned int down_threshold;
};
static struct dbs_tuners dbs_tuners_ins = {
.up_threshold = DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD,
- .down_threshold = DEF_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD,
.sampling_down_factor = DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR,
};
@@ -114,7 +108,6 @@ static ssize_t show_##file_name \
show_one(sampling_rate, sampling_rate);
show_one(sampling_down_factor, sampling_down_factor);
show_one(up_threshold, up_threshold);
-show_one(down_threshold, down_threshold);
static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *unused,
const char *buf, size_t count)
@@ -160,8 +153,7 @@ static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct
down(&dbs_sem);
if (ret != 1 || input > MAX_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD ||
- input < MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD ||
- input <= dbs_tuners_ins.down_threshold) {
+ input < MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD) {
up(&dbs_sem);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -172,26 +164,6 @@ static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct
return count;
}
-static ssize_t store_down_threshold(struct cpufreq_policy *unused,
- const char *buf, size_t count)
-{
- unsigned int input;
- int ret;
- ret = sscanf (buf, "%u", &input);
-
- down(&dbs_sem);
- if (ret != 1 || input > MAX_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD ||
- input < MIN_FREQUENCY_DOWN_THRESHOLD ||
- input >= dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold) {
- up(&dbs_sem);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- dbs_tuners_ins.down_threshold = input;
- up(&dbs_sem);
-
- return count;
-}
#define define_one_rw(_name) \
static struct freq_attr _name = \
@@ -200,7 +172,6 @@ __ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_
define_one_rw(sampling_rate);
define_one_rw(sampling_down_factor);
define_one_rw(up_threshold);
-define_one_rw(down_threshold);
static struct attribute * dbs_attributes[] = {
&sampling_rate_max.attr,
@@ -208,7 +179,6 @@ static struct attribute * dbs_attributes
&sampling_rate.attr,
&sampling_down_factor.attr,
&up_threshold.attr,
- &down_threshold.attr,
NULL
};
@@ -221,8 +191,8 @@ static struct attribute_group dbs_attr_g
static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
{
- unsigned int idle_ticks, up_idle_ticks, down_idle_ticks;
- unsigned int freq_down_step;
+ unsigned int idle_ticks, up_idle_ticks, total_ticks;
+ unsigned int freq_next;
unsigned int freq_down_sampling_rate;
static int down_skip[NR_CPUS];
struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info;
@@ -240,13 +210,13 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
* Every sampling_rate, we check
* - If current idle time is less than 20%, then we try to
* increase frequency
- * Every sampling_rate*sampling_down_factor, we check
- * - If current idle time is more than 80%, then we try to
- * decrease frequency
+ * Every sampling_rate*sampling_down_factor, we look for a the lowest
+ * frequency which can sustain the load while keeping idle time over
+ * 30%. If such a frequency exist, we try to decrease to this frequency.
*
* Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency.
- * Frequency reduction happens at minimum steps of
- * 5% of max_frequency
+ * Frequency reduction happens at minimum steps of 5% of current
+ * frequency.
*/
/* Check for frequency increase */
@@ -289,7 +259,12 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
down_skip[cpu]++;
if (down_skip[cpu] < dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_down_factor)
return;
+ down_skip[cpu] = 0;
+ /* don't try to decrease the frequency if it's already the min */
+ if (policy->cur == policy->min)
+ return;
+
idle_ticks = UINT_MAX;
for_each_cpu_mask(j, policy->cpus) {
unsigned int tmp_idle_ticks, total_idle_ticks;
@@ -307,27 +282,21 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(int cpu)
idle_ticks = tmp_idle_ticks;
}
- /* Scale idle ticks by 100 and compare with up and down ticks */
- idle_ticks *= 100;
- down_skip[cpu] = 0;
-
+ /* Compute how many ticks there are between two measurements */
freq_down_sampling_rate = dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate *
dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_down_factor;
- down_idle_ticks = (100 - dbs_tuners_ins.down_threshold) *
- usecs_to_jiffies(freq_down_sampling_rate);
-
- if (idle_ticks > down_idle_ticks) {
- freq_down_step = (5 * policy->max) / 100;
-
- /* max freq cannot be less than 100. But who knows.... */
- if (unlikely(freq_down_step == 0))
- freq_down_step = 5;
-
- __cpufreq_driver_target(policy,
- policy->cur - freq_down_step,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
- return;
- }
+ total_ticks = usecs_to_jiffies(freq_down_sampling_rate);
+
+ /*
+ * The optimal frequency is the frequency that is the lowest that
+ * can support the current CPU usage without triggering
+ * the up policy. To be safe, we focus 10 points under the threshold.
+ */
+ freq_next = ((total_ticks - idle_ticks) * 100) / total_ticks;
+ freq_next = (freq_next * policy->cur) / (dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold - 10);
+
+ if (freq_next <= ((policy->cur * 95) / 100))
+ __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
}
static void do_dbs_timer(void *data)
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 147 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-11 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-14 7:29 cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14 7:57 ` Eric Piel
2005-03-14 7:57 ` Eric Piel
2005-03-14 11:19 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-03-14 11:19 ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-03-14 12:40 ` Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14 12:40 ` Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14 22:39 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-03-14 22:39 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-05-11 1:33 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-11 1:33 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-11 2:34 ` Dave Jones
2005-05-11 12:19 ` Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:23 ` [PATCH] [1/3] ondemand governor clean-up Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:27 ` [PATCH][2/3] ondemand governor store the idle ticks for all cpus Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:31 ` Eric Piel [this message]
2005-05-12 23:16 ` cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Eric Piel
2005-05-17 0:15 ` [PATCH] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanup Venkatesh Pallipadi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4281FB3C.5090400@tremplin-utc.net \
--to=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
--cc=cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.