All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk, Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold?
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:33:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050511013334.GB8039@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net>

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:57:52AM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
 > Jan De Luyck a écrit :
 > >Hello lists,
 > >
 > >(please cc me from cpufreq list)
 > >
 > >I've since yesterday started using the ondemand governor. Seems to work 
 > >fine, tho I can't seem to find a reason why it keeps scaling my processor 
 > >speed upwards tho the processor use never exceeds 30% (been watching top 
 > >-d 1). 
 > :
 > :
 > >Any hints?
 > You can try the three attached patches in the order :
 > ondemand-cleanup-factorise-idle-measurement-2.6.11.patch
 > ondemand-save-idle-up-for-all-cpu-2.6.11.patch
 > ondemand-automatic-downscaling-2.6.11-accepted.patch
 > 
 > They are available on the cpufreq list but as it's difficult to access 
 > it I'm sending them again, all together. These are the last things that 
 > Venki and I have been working on. It should solve your problem 
 > (actually, only the last patch, but it depends on the two previous 
 > patches). Please, let me know if it works.
 > 
 > BTW, DaveJ, Dominik, I couldn't find them in the daily-snapshot 
 > available at codemonkey.org.uk. Should I worry, or is it just due to 
 > some latency between your private trees and the public one?

I'm preparing the first cpufreq->linus sync right now.
Can you write up some descriptions & signed-off-by: lines for
these three please ?

Thanks,
		Dave

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Cc: Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk,
	linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold?
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:33:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050511013334.GB8039@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net>

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:57:52AM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
 > Jan De Luyck a écrit :
 > >Hello lists,
 > >
 > >(please cc me from cpufreq list)
 > >
 > >I've since yesterday started using the ondemand governor. Seems to work 
 > >fine, tho I can't seem to find a reason why it keeps scaling my processor 
 > >speed upwards tho the processor use never exceeds 30% (been watching top 
 > >-d 1). 
 > :
 > :
 > >Any hints?
 > You can try the three attached patches in the order :
 > ondemand-cleanup-factorise-idle-measurement-2.6.11.patch
 > ondemand-save-idle-up-for-all-cpu-2.6.11.patch
 > ondemand-automatic-downscaling-2.6.11-accepted.patch
 > 
 > They are available on the cpufreq list but as it's difficult to access 
 > it I'm sending them again, all together. These are the last things that 
 > Venki and I have been working on. It should solve your problem 
 > (actually, only the last patch, but it depends on the two previous 
 > patches). Please, let me know if it works.
 > 
 > BTW, DaveJ, Dominik, I couldn't find them in the daily-snapshot 
 > available at codemonkey.org.uk. Should I worry, or is it just due to 
 > some latency between your private trees and the public one?

I'm preparing the first cpufreq->linus sync right now.
Can you write up some descriptions & signed-off-by: lines for
these three please ?

Thanks,
		Dave


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-11  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-14  7:29 cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14  7:57 ` Eric Piel
2005-03-14  7:57   ` Eric Piel
2005-03-14 11:19   ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-03-14 11:19     ` Bruno Ducrot
2005-03-14 12:40   ` Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14 12:40     ` Jan De Luyck
2005-03-14 22:39   ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-03-14 22:39     ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-05-11  1:33   ` Dave Jones [this message]
2005-05-11  1:33     ` Dave Jones
2005-05-11  2:34     ` Dave Jones
2005-05-11 12:19       ` Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:23         ` [PATCH] [1/3] ondemand governor clean-up Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:27         ` [PATCH][2/3] ondemand governor store the idle ticks for all cpus Eric Piel
2005-05-11 12:31         ` [PATCH][3/3] ondemand governor automatic downscaling Eric Piel
2005-05-12 23:16         ` cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Eric Piel
2005-05-17  0:15           ` [PATCH] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanup Venkatesh Pallipadi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-11 16:00 cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050511013334.GB8039@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net \
    --cc=cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=lkml@kcore.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.