* [LARTC] Broken filters?
@ 2005-05-06 6:16 Pan'ko Alexzender
2005-05-11 22:39 ` Andy Furniss
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pan'ko Alexzender @ 2005-05-06 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi!
By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ.
There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20
Why I see 3 pkts in default 1:30?
How explain it?
### imq0: queueing disciplines
qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 30 direct_packets_stat 0
Sent 631429 bytes 1812 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 20)
### imq0: traffic classes
class htb 1:20 root prio 0 rate 100Kbit ceil 100Kbit burst 15Kb cburst 1727b
Sent 630596 bytes 1809 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
rate 3921bps 10pps
lended: 1809 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: 1121920 ctokens: 31360
class htb 1:30 root prio 7 rate 10Kbit ceil 80Kbit burst 1611b cburst 1701b
Sent 833 bytes 3 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
rate 2bps
lended: 3 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: 1244800 ctokens: 164600
### imq0: filtering rules
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 fw
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 fw handle 0x6a classid 1:20
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 fw handle 0x6b classid 1:20
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 fw handle 0x6c classid 1:20
Thanks for the attantion.
--
With best regards, Pan'ko Alexzender.
pankoAA@yandex.ru
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] Broken filters?
2005-05-06 6:16 [LARTC] Broken filters? Pan'ko Alexzender
@ 2005-05-11 22:39 ` Andy Furniss
2005-05-12 4:38 ` Pan'ko Alexzender
2005-05-12 20:00 ` Andy Furniss
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Furniss @ 2005-05-11 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Pan'ko Alexzender wrote:
> Hi!
> By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ.
> There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20
What are the rules.
>
> Why I see 3 pkts in default 1:30?
> How explain it?
Maybe there was traffic flowing when you ran the script.
Andy.
>
>
> ### imq0: queueing disciplines
>
> qdisc htb 1: r2q 10 default 30 direct_packets_stat 0
> Sent 631429 bytes 1812 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 20)
>
> ### imq0: traffic classes
>
> class htb 1:20 root prio 0 rate 100Kbit ceil 100Kbit burst 15Kb cburst 1727b
> Sent 630596 bytes 1809 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
> rate 3921bps 10pps
> lended: 1809 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
> tokens: 1121920 ctokens: 31360
>
> class htb 1:30 root prio 7 rate 10Kbit ceil 80Kbit burst 1611b cburst 1701b
> Sent 833 bytes 3 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
> rate 2bps
> lended: 3 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
> tokens: 1244800 ctokens: 164600
>
>
> ### imq0: filtering rules
>
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 fw
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 fw handle 0x6a classid 1:20
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 fw handle 0x6b classid 1:20
> filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 100 fw handle 0x6c classid 1:20
>
> Thanks for the attantion.
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Broken filters?
2005-05-06 6:16 [LARTC] Broken filters? Pan'ko Alexzender
2005-05-11 22:39 ` Andy Furniss
@ 2005-05-12 4:38 ` Pan'ko Alexzender
2005-05-12 20:00 ` Andy Furniss
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pan'ko Alexzender @ 2005-05-12 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Wed, 11 May 2005 23:39:35 +0100
Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> Pan'ko Alexzender wrote:
> > Hi!
> > By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ.
> > There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20
>
> What are the rules.
There was three tables. At the end of each placed such rules:
iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK1 -j MARK --set-mark 106
iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK1 -j IMQ --todev 0
iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK2 -j MARK --set-mark 107
iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK2 -j IMQ --todev 0
iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK2 -j MARK --set-mark 108
iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK2 -j IMQ --todev 0
>
> >
> > Why I see 3 pkts in default 1:30?
> > How explain it?
>
> Maybe there was traffic flowing when you ran the script.
No. Than it rizes.
I recive too answears from:
gypsy <gypsy@iswest.com>
"Most likeley the packets in 1:30 are not TCP. They are probably UDP or
ARP or ICMP."
Marcin Ka_u_a <mk@sekretarka.no-ip.org>
"These are ARP packets. See Andy's reply to my question from 03 May in the
archives"
I think they are right. But now I have mach more bigger problems, that makes me forgot this :).
I think it is problems of new kernel 2.6.11. There are configuration that makes karnel panic.
And IMQ not realy shapting (rate is not limited realy)... Now I testing this all...
Now I am wating for kernel pathes and trying lastest normal and test relises.
--
With best regards, Pan'ko Alexzender.
pankoAA@yandex.ru
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Broken filters?
2005-05-06 6:16 [LARTC] Broken filters? Pan'ko Alexzender
2005-05-11 22:39 ` Andy Furniss
2005-05-12 4:38 ` Pan'ko Alexzender
@ 2005-05-12 20:00 ` Andy Furniss
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Furniss @ 2005-05-12 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Pan'ko Alexzender wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2005 23:39:35 +0100
> Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Pan'ko Alexzender wrote:
>>
>>>Hi!
>>>By iptables I set marking (-j MARK) just before -j IMQ.
>>>There are only three marks. Exectly all of them are ditected to 1:20
>>
>>What are the rules.
>
>
> There was three tables. At the end of each placed such rules:
>
> iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK1 -j MARK --set-mark 106
> iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK1 -j IMQ --todev 0
>
> iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK2 -j MARK --set-mark 107
> iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK2 -j IMQ --todev 0
>
> iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK2 -j MARK --set-mark 108
> iptables -t mangle -A IMQ_MARK2 -j IMQ --todev 0
>
>>>Why I see 3 pkts in default 1:30?
>>>How explain it?
>>
>>Maybe there was traffic flowing when you ran the script.
>
>
> No. Than it rizes.
Ahh OK
>
>
> I recive too answears from:
>
> gypsy <gypsy@iswest.com>
> "Most likeley the packets in 1:30 are not TCP. They are probably UDP or
> ARP or ICMP."
>
> Marcin Ka_u_a <mk@sekretarka.no-ip.org>
> "These are ARP packets. See Andy's reply to my question from 03 May in the
> archives"
In the case of imq the arp going to default doesn't happen because
traffic is sent from iptables and iptables doesn't see arp packets.
>
> I think they are right. But now I have mach more bigger problems, that makes me forgot this :).
>
>
>
> I think it is problems of new kernel 2.6.11. There are configuration that makes karnel panic.
> And IMQ not realy shapting (rate is not limited realy)... Now I testing this all...
>
> Now I am wating for kernel pathes and trying lastest normal and test relises.
Maybe this is it - I have seen other reports of IMQ + 2.6.11.x being
unstable.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-12 20:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-06 6:16 [LARTC] Broken filters? Pan'ko Alexzender
2005-05-11 22:39 ` Andy Furniss
2005-05-12 4:38 ` Pan'ko Alexzender
2005-05-12 20:00 ` Andy Furniss
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.