All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [uml-devel] Uploaded new version of the test program and x86-64 SKAS patch working with it
@ 2005-05-16 18:20 Blaisorblade
  2005-05-16 18:58 ` Frank Sorenson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-16 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Rogers, Jeff Dike; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel

First: the new SKAS patch does not yet support UML. However, it should support 
both modes for the test program. Jeff, I guess you might want to take a look 
at it (I'm working on this too).

Actually, the test program should use EX_FAULTINFO instead of FAULTINFO for 
x86-64 (including trap_no) but I've not yet changed the test program, only 
the patch (which does not support FAULTINFO for 64-bit processes).
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [uml-devel] Uploaded new version of the test program and x86-64 SKAS patch working with it
  2005-05-16 18:20 [uml-devel] Uploaded new version of the test program and x86-64 SKAS patch working with it Blaisorblade
@ 2005-05-16 18:58 ` Frank Sorenson
  2005-05-16 21:28   ` Blaisorblade
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Frank Sorenson @ 2005-05-16 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Blaisorblade; +Cc: Jeff Dike, user-mode-linux-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Blaisorblade wrote:
> First: the new SKAS patch does not yet support UML. However, it should support 
> both modes for the test program. Jeff, I guess you might want to take a look 
> at it (I'm working on this too).

Blaisorblade,

Thanks for working on the SKAS patch.

Question.  Are you saying that skas-2.6.12-rc4-v9-pre4 doesn't work yet,
or just doesn't work on x86-64?  For x86, should we stick with -pre2 for
now, or should -pre4 be stable?

Thanks,

Frank
- --
Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK
Systems Manager, Computer Science Department
Brigham Young University
frank@tuxrocks.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCiO1iaI0dwg4A47wRAp8vAKDoSSl1a2S8Q016FF457SXljmUangCdGnYG
a+CyEc/y24DXqTkXz5H/jRk=
=XPw4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [uml-devel] Uploaded new version of the test program and x86-64 SKAS patch working with it
  2005-05-16 18:58 ` Frank Sorenson
@ 2005-05-16 21:28   ` Blaisorblade
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Blaisorblade @ 2005-05-16 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: user-mode-linux-devel; +Cc: Frank Sorenson, Jeff Dike

On Monday 16 May 2005 20:58, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > First: the new SKAS patch does not yet support UML. However, it should
> > support both modes for the test program. Jeff, I guess you might want to
> > take a look at it (I'm working on this too).
>
> Blaisorblade,
>
> Thanks for working on the SKAS patch.
>
> Question.  Are you saying that skas-2.6.12-rc4-v9-pre4 doesn't work yet,
> or just doesn't work on x86-64? 
The second one.
> For x86, should we stick with -pre2 for 
> now, or should -pre4 be stable?
For x86 there should be no visible changes, and if there are any that's a bug. 
So stick with -pre2 (or even with -V8, since pre-release means pre-release).
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-16 22:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-16 18:20 [uml-devel] Uploaded new version of the test program and x86-64 SKAS patch working with it Blaisorblade
2005-05-16 18:58 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-05-16 21:28   ` Blaisorblade

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.