From: Nebojsa Trpkovic <trxman@gmail.com>
To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: [Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)]
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 01:25:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <428BCEE7.2040008@gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 21 bytes --]
Unfortunately...
[-- Attachment #2: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 7827 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 229 bytes --]
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, due to being unable to connect successfully to the destination mail server.
support@chaintech.de
[-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: message/delivery-status, Size: 254 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.1.3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 5968 bytes --]
From: <trxman@gmail.com>
To: <support@chaintech.de>
Subject: New Required from Chaintech Web
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:11:18 +0800
Message-ID: <CH-WEBSITEAOeIiGXix0000001c@CH-website>
Frist Name : Nebojsa
Last Name : Trpkovic
Mail Date : 2005/5/17
Mail Address : trxman@gmail.com
Select Country : Germany
Telephone No :
FAX No :
Main Board Model : VNF3-250
VGA Type : Xelo Ti4200 8x
Product Serial Number : 0412035507
Distributor / Retailer : http://www.dualc.co.yu/
Problem Description : So, I have this issue and as I can see there are
more people out there that have the same issue.<br>
On my board C'n'Q works fine if there is one RAM module. If there is two
modules (no matter dimm 1 & 2 or 1 & 3 are populated) C'n'Q locks machine
and I have to do hard reset.<br>
<br>
Memory modules are 2 x Kingmax Color RAM 466MHz CAS 3.0 256MB single
sidded modules, running at 400MHz with timmings "BY SPD". In that
situation, command rate is 2T but it does not help.<br>
It happens both in Windows and in Linux (Gentoo Linux with 2.6.11
kernel).<br>
<br>
C'n'Q works just as it should work if I put just one memory module, both
in Windows and in Linux.<br>
<br>
All that is not so big problem to me because there's no way to dinamicly
slow down fans on the board, so any dinamic changing of frequency looses
its' significance.<br>
I wrote this to you because AMD represent on cpufreq list told me so.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Nebojsa Trpkovic<br>
<br>
P.S. I'm from Serbia & Montenegro and there's no way to select my
country.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
If this problem also occurs on Windows, please report<br>
it to your motherboard manufacturer immediately. They'll<br>
get it fixed.<br>
<br>
-Mark Langsdorf<br>
AMD, Inc.<br>
<br>
<br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk <br>
>> [mailto:cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk] On Behalf Of <br>
>> Nebojsa Trpkovic<br>
>> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 6:50 PM<br>
>> To: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk<br>
>> Subject: Re: cpu-freq causing kernel lock-up after upgrading <br>
>> to 1GB ram.<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Same problem here - VNF3-250 - if there's one RAM module <br>
>> C'n'Q works fine, and if I put two modules it freezes every <br>
>> time I try to change frequency, no matter linux or windows. <br>
>> So, it's not cpufreq related problem - it just buggy VNF3-250 <br>
>> C'n'Q inplementation.<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> chris stones wrote:<br>
>> <br>
><br>
>>> > This is my first attempt at a bug report, so forgive me for <br>
><br>
>> making a <br>
><br>
>>> > mess, I will try my best.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > -------------------------<br>
>>> > hardware:<br>
>>> > -------------------------<br>
>>> > mobo: Chaintech VNF3-250<br>
>>> > chipset: nForce-3<br>
>>> > CPU: amd64 Athlon 3400+<br>
>>> > Ram: 2 * Kingston 512Meg DDR400 PC3200 2T timeing 3-3-8-3. <br>
><br>
>> (total 1GB) <br>
><br>
>>> > Swap : 1.3 Gb.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > --------------------------<br>
>>> > software:<br>
>>> > --------------------------<br>
>>> > Distro: Gentoo 2005.0 (comiped as 64bit with multilib)<br>
>>> > GCC: gcc version 3.4.3 20041125 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3-r1,
ssp-3.4.3-0,<br>
>>> > pie-8.7.7)<br>
>>> > kernel versions: gentoo 2.6.11-r7; vanilla-2.6.10;
vanilla-2.6.11.9<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > --------------------------<br>
>>> > description:<br>
>>> > --------------------------<br>
>>> > I have been using the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand, <br>
>>> > powernow_k8 to regulate my cpu clock for over 6 months with the <br>
>>> > hardware configureation shown above, minus one 512meg ram
module.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > Recently, i shutdown the box, and added the second memory <br>
><br>
>> module. At <br>
><br>
>>> > the time, the cpu_fre drivers were compiled into the <br>
><br>
>> kernel, shortly <br>
><br>
>>> > after booting, the system would freese when cpu_freq <br>
><br>
>> lowered my cpu to <br>
><br>
>>> > its idle state of 1Ghz.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > These conditions must all be met to cause the lock-up.<br>
>>> > 1) Both Ram moodules are used (1GB ram)<br>
>>> > 2) the modules freq_table, cpufreq_ondemand, powernow_k8 are
loaded.<br>
>>> > 3) The lockup occurs when the cpu is slowing down from a period of
<br>
>>> > heavy load.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > 2 hours running memtest86 shows that my memory is not the
problem.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > one one occasion, the kernel gave a memory dump before the <br>
><br>
>> freeze. i <br>
><br>
>>> > regret i didnt take note of its rull contents, but a function trace
<br>
>>> > line mentioned a cpu_freq function call.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > If i remove one of the 512meg memory modules, the cpu_freq <br>
>>> > performsperfectly, as it has for the past 6 months.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > Thankyou for taking the time to read my post.<br>
>>> > Is there anything i can do (other than go without ram or <br>
><br>
>> cpu_freq) to <br>
><br>
>>> > solve this ? is there any more information you require from me ?<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > I have googled, but found no other similar bug reports.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > From Chris.stones@gmail.com.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > _______________________________________________<br>
>>> > Cpufreq mailing list<br>
>>> > Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk <br>
>>> > http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq<br>
>>> ><br>
><br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Cpufreq mailing list<br>
>> Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk <br>
>> http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpu> freq<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
BIOS Date : 2004/10/19
CD Version :
Operating System : both Windows and Linux 2.6.11
CPU Type : AMD Athlon64 3000+ (Newcastle core)
Memory Modules : 2 x 256MB Kingmax Color RAM 466MHz CAS 3.0
Other Devices :
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 147 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq
reply other threads:[~2005-05-18 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=428BCEE7.2040008@gmail.com \
--to=trxman@gmail.com \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.