All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 08:50:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4294201D.4070304@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1116975478.7710.28.camel@mulgrave>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2168 bytes --]

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 11:38 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>whenever the scsi-ml tries to scan non-existent devices the reference
>>count in scsi_alloc_sdev() and scsi_probe_and_add_lun() is not adjusted
>>properly. Every call to XXX_initialize in the driver core sets the
>>reference count to 1, so for a proper deallocation an explicit XXX_put()
>>has to be done.
> 
> That's true, but I don't see what the problem is if the device has never
> been made visible.
> 
It's not visible but it's still allocated and referenced. So on doing a
rmmod these class_devices are being deallocated which crashes as the
class device is not connected properly.

>>+			put_device(&starget->dev);
> 
> this would amount to a double put, since the parent put method is called
> in the device release.
> 
Oops. Correct.

>>+	class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
> 
> This is unnecessary since the class device is simply occupying a private
> area in the scsi_device.  As long as its never made visible to the
> system, its refcount is irrelevant
> 
It's not. Whenever you try to rmmod the adapter it becomes highly
relevant. If it doesn't crash you've at least generated a memleak as the
class device is never freed.
(And these are quite a few for Wide-SCSI Double-channel adapters ...)

>> 	put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
>> out:
>> 	if (display_failure_msg)
>>@@ -855,6 +857,8 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
>> 		if (sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy)
>> 			sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy(sdev);
>> 		transport_destroy_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
>>+		class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
>>+		put_device(sdev->sdev_gendev.parent);
> 
> same should apply here.  As long as this cascade occurs before
> scsi_add_lun() (which calls scsi_sysfs_add_sdev()), which is what makes
> the whole set of devices and classes visible.
> 
Correct for the parent device. The class device has to be deallocated
properly if a rmmod should work properly.

New patch attached. Please apply.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke			hare@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG				S390 & zSeries
Maxfeldstraße 5				+49 911 74053 688
90409 Nürnberg				http://www.suse.de

[-- Attachment #2: linux-2.6.12-rc4-scsi-scan-fix-refcount-on-fail --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1047 bytes --]

From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Fix refcount for failed devices

When a non-present device is scanned it is not properly deregistered
from the driver core. Calling XXX_initialize() functions from the driver
core sets the reference count to 1, so for proper deallocation a
XXX_put() has to be issued.

--- linux-2.6.12-rc4/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c.orig	2005-05-24 10:26:46.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc4/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2005-05-24 10:55:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static struct scsi_device *scsi_alloc_sd
 out_device_destroy:
 	transport_destroy_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
 	scsi_free_queue(sdev->request_queue);
+	class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
 	put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
 out:
 	if (display_failure_msg)
@@ -855,6 +856,7 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct
 		if (sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy)
 			sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy(sdev);
 		transport_destroy_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
+		class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
 		put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
 	}
  out:

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-25  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-24  9:38 [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-24 22:57 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25  6:50   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2005-05-25 12:27     ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 12:46       ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 12:46         ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 14:58         ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 15:16           ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 15:16             ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 17:51             ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 18:01               ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4294201D.4070304@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.