All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 14:46:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <429473A1.6010402@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1117024043.5071.6.camel@mulgrave>

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 08:50 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>>+	class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
>>>This is unnecessary since the class device is simply occupying a private
>>>area in the scsi_device.  As long as its never made visible to the
>>>system, its refcount is irrelevant
>>>
>>It's not. Whenever you try to rmmod the adapter it becomes highly
>>relevant. If it doesn't crash you've at least generated a memleak as the
>>class device is never freed.
>>(And these are quite a few for Wide-SCSI Double-channel adapters ...)
> 
> ?  Look at the code; you're not doing a put on a pointer to the
> sdev_classdev, you're doing a put on a reference to it.
> 
> It's defined in scsi_device.h:
> 
> struct scsi_device {
> 	...
> 	struct class_device sdev_classdev;
> 	...
> };
> 
> so it's contained within the scsi_device.  Freeing the scsi_device frees
> the classdev (and the gendev).
> 
But does not call the ->release function.

Put it the other way round: does 'rmmod aic7xxx' work for you?
It certainly did _not_ work for aic79xx, hence the fix.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke			hare@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG				S390 & zSeries
Maxfeldstraße 5				+49 911 74053 688
90409 Nürnberg				http://www.suse.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 14:46:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <429473A1.6010402@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1117024043.5071.6.camel@mulgrave>

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 08:50 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>>+	class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
>>>This is unnecessary since the class device is simply occupying a private
>>>area in the scsi_device.  As long as its never made visible to the
>>>system, its refcount is irrelevant
>>>
>>It's not. Whenever you try to rmmod the adapter it becomes highly
>>relevant. If it doesn't crash you've at least generated a memleak as the
>>class device is never freed.
>>(And these are quite a few for Wide-SCSI Double-channel adapters ...)
> 
> ?  Look at the code; you're not doing a put on a pointer to the
> sdev_classdev, you're doing a put on a reference to it.
> 
> It's defined in scsi_device.h:
> 
> struct scsi_device {
> 	...
> 	struct class_device sdev_classdev;
> 	...
> };
> 
> so it's contained within the scsi_device.  Freeing the scsi_device frees
> the classdev (and the gendev).
> 
But does not call the ->release function.

Put it the other way round: does 'rmmod aic7xxx' work for you?
It certainly did _not_ work for aic79xx, hence the fix.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke			hare@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG				S390 & zSeries
Maxfeldstraße 5				+49 911 74053 688
90409 Nürnberg				http://www.suse.de

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-25 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-24  9:38 [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-24 22:57 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25  6:50   ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 12:27     ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 12:46       ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2005-05-25 12:46         ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 14:58         ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 15:16           ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 15:16             ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 17:51             ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 18:01               ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=429473A1.6010402@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.