* [OT] pull request notation
@ 2005-05-25 0:59 Junio C Hamano
2005-05-26 2:40 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2005-05-25 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jgarzik, torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel
>>>>> "JG" == Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> writes:
JG> Please pull the 'new-ids' branch from
JG>
JG> rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
JG>
JG> This add...
I am not a kernel developer, but I think the way this particular
pull request is worded can be made much more friendly to Cogito
users (that probably is the rest of the world except you, me and
Linus ;-). They use URL fragment notation to express the branch
head, like this:
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git#new-ids
At least for me, eyes always skip to the "rsync://..." part
immediately after seeing "Please pull.." part.
For Linus I am willing to volunteer updating git-pull-script to
take the same URL fragment notation, but as Jeff correctly
pointed out it already takes the "branch" name as its second
parameter so it probably would not be necessary.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [OT] pull request notation
2005-05-25 0:59 [OT] pull request notation Junio C Hamano
@ 2005-05-26 2:40 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2005-05-26 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>>>>"JG" == Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> writes:
>
>
> JG> Please pull the 'new-ids' branch from
> JG>
> JG> rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
> JG>
> JG> This add...
>
> I am not a kernel developer, but I think the way this particular
> pull request is worded can be made much more friendly to Cogito
> users (that probably is the rest of the world except you, me and
> Linus ;-). They use URL fragment notation to express the branch
> head, like this:
>
> rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git#new-ids
>
> At least for me, eyes always skip to the "rsync://..." part
> immediately after seeing "Please pull.." part.
>
> For Linus I am willing to volunteer updating git-pull-script to
> take the same URL fragment notation, but as Jeff correctly
> pointed out it already takes the "branch" name as its second
> parameter so it probably would not be necessary.
It's up to Linus really, he's the consumer of these messages.
Given that git-pull-script requires two arguments, URL and optional
branch, it sounds like
'rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
new-ids' would be the best syntax, if it weren't for darned word wrap.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-26 2:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-25 0:59 [OT] pull request notation Junio C Hamano
2005-05-26 2:40 ` Jeff Garzik
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.