* Reiserfs Sloooow Boot
@ 2005-05-25 15:30 Ricardo (Tru64 User)
2005-05-26 9:13 ` Edward Shishkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo (Tru64 User) @ 2005-05-25 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
Hi Guys,
First time posting here...after spending couple hours
in the mail archives.
I am running mandrake 10, 10.1 with reiserfs 3.6.11
I have used reiserfs for a number of years...previous
with mandrake 8,9,9.2 (not sure what version of
reiserfs was in use then).
Since converting all nodes to Mandrake 10.0,(comes
with reiserfs 3.6.110, reboots (even clean ones) are
painfully sloooow!
For an empty reiserfs filesystem, 2TB in size, it
takes about 7-10mins to complete:
May 25 11:02:20 node2 kernel: reiserfs: found format
"3.6" with standard journal
May 25 11:04:22 node2 kernel: reiserfs: checking
transaction log (device sd(8,17)) ...
May 25 11:04:22 node2 kernel: for (sd(8,17))
May 25 11:04:22 node2 kernel: sd(8,17):Using r5 hash
to sort names
--------------------------
I have another empty filesystem created on a Logical
Volume (LV), that is 5TB. That one takes about 15-20
minutes to boot+mount!!
This was not the case in previous installs, where my
largest filesystems were 1TB.
Does reiserfs have performance limitations with
filesystem size?
I took on XFS for trial purpose....formating the same
5TB partition with XFS, and reboots are extremely
quick! Barely two minutes, node is up, vs. 15 minutes
with reiserfs.
Any tweaking recommendations? More info that I should
provide? Hardware is a mix of promise technologies
(ATA to SCSI) raid boxes, and EonStor (SATA to SCSI)
raid boxes, some using LSI logic card as HBA, and
others using adaptec 39160, same issue.
Server hardware is Dell PowerEdge 1750, 4GB ram, Dual
Xeon 3.2 processors.
I am hoping someone will lead me to some tuning to
reduce this delay. I can't use xfs, since on some
nodes i have to use kernel 2.4.26 (vanilla) that
doesnt support xfs, and besides, I have been a default
reiserfs user for a while, so I am not about to start
converting all 20-30TB paritions into XFS. For now, I
prepare 30mins for reboot whenever i have too...which
means they cant happen on work week, otherwise too
much cursing will occur.
I am using reiserfs for all partitions, including
root. Delay is much noticeable on the external
devices, which are the largest partitions.
_Thanks
Richard
More info that might be helpful::
]# debugreiserfs /dev/sdb1
debugreiserfs 3.6.11 (2003 www.namesys.com)
Filesystem state: consistency is not checked after
last mounting
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x811 of format
3.6 with standard journal
Count of blocks on the device: 524287996
Number of bitmaps: 16000
Blocksize: 4096
Free blocks (count of blocks - used [journal, bitmaps,
data, reserved] blocks): 521696895
Root block: 457391
Filesystem is NOT cleanly umounted
Tree height: 5
Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
Objectid map size 2, max 972
Journal parameters:
Device [0x0]
Magic [0x36901ac5]
Size 8193 blocks (including 1 for journal
header) (first block 18)
Max transaction length 1024 blocks
Max batch size 900 blocks
Max commit age 30
Blocks reserved by journal: 0
Fs state field: 0x0:
sb_version: 2
inode generation number: 1
UUID: d1e512ee-d5b7-41f9-a0cc-1cc99b58f587
LABEL:
Set flags in SB:
ATTRIBUTES CLEAN
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Reiserfs Sloooow Boot
2005-05-25 15:30 Reiserfs Sloooow Boot Ricardo (Tru64 User)
@ 2005-05-26 9:13 ` Edward Shishkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Edward Shishkin @ 2005-05-26 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo (Tru64 User); +Cc: reiserfs-list
Ricardo (Tru64 User) wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>First time posting here...after spending couple hours
>in the mail archives.
>I am running mandrake 10, 10.1 with reiserfs 3.6.11
>I have used reiserfs for a number of years...previous
>with mandrake 8,9,9.2 (not sure what version of
>reiserfs was in use then).
>Since converting all nodes to Mandrake 10.0,(comes
>with reiserfs 3.6.110, reboots (even clean ones) are
>painfully sloooow!
>
>For an empty reiserfs filesystem, 2TB in size, it
>takes about 7-10mins to complete:
>May 25 11:02:20 node2 kernel: reiserfs: found format
>"3.6" with standard journal
>May 25 11:04:22 node2 kernel: reiserfs: checking
>transaction log (device sd(8,17)) ...
>May 25 11:04:22 node2 kernel: for (sd(8,17))
>May 25 11:04:22 node2 kernel: sd(8,17):Using r5 hash
>to sort names
>--------------------------
>
>I have another empty filesystem created on a Logical
>Volume (LV), that is 5TB. That one takes about 15-20
>minutes to boot+mount!!
>
>
This is because reiserfs load all bitmap blocks at mount time.
It seems 15 min is a minimal time we can provide for you: 5TB
means that reiserfs needs to read more then 40 000 bitmap
blocks.
>This was not the case in previous installs, where my
>largest filesystems were 1TB.
>Does reiserfs have performance limitations with
>filesystem size?
>
>I took on XFS for trial purpose....formating the same
>5TB partition with XFS, and reboots are extremely
>quick! Barely two minutes, node is up, vs. 15 minutes
>with reiserfs.
>
>
Quick mount of 5TB means slowdown of other things.
Reiser4 has a mount option which allows to load bitmap blocks
dynamically if you prefer to wait for other blocks next time when
it is needed..
Edward.
>Any tweaking recommendations? More info that I should
>provide? Hardware is a mix of promise technologies
>(ATA to SCSI) raid boxes, and EonStor (SATA to SCSI)
>raid boxes, some using LSI logic card as HBA, and
>others using adaptec 39160, same issue.
>Server hardware is Dell PowerEdge 1750, 4GB ram, Dual
>Xeon 3.2 processors.
>
>I am hoping someone will lead me to some tuning to
>reduce this delay. I can't use xfs, since on some
>nodes i have to use kernel 2.4.26 (vanilla) that
>doesnt support xfs, and besides, I have been a default
>reiserfs user for a while, so I am not about to start
>converting all 20-30TB paritions into XFS. For now, I
>prepare 30mins for reboot whenever i have too...which
>means they cant happen on work week, otherwise too
>much cursing will occur.
>
>I am using reiserfs for all partitions, including
>root. Delay is much noticeable on the external
>devices, which are the largest partitions.
>
>_Thanks
>
>Richard
>
>
>
>More info that might be helpful::
>
>]# debugreiserfs /dev/sdb1
>debugreiserfs 3.6.11 (2003 www.namesys.com)
>
>
>Filesystem state: consistency is not checked after
>last mounting
>
>Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x811 of format
>3.6 with standard journal
>Count of blocks on the device: 524287996
>Number of bitmaps: 16000
>Blocksize: 4096
>Free blocks (count of blocks - used [journal, bitmaps,
>data, reserved] blocks): 521696895
>Root block: 457391
>Filesystem is NOT cleanly umounted
>Tree height: 5
>Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
>Objectid map size 2, max 972
>Journal parameters:
> Device [0x0]
> Magic [0x36901ac5]
> Size 8193 blocks (including 1 for journal
>header) (first block 18)
> Max transaction length 1024 blocks
> Max batch size 900 blocks
> Max commit age 30
>Blocks reserved by journal: 0
>Fs state field: 0x0:
>sb_version: 2
>inode generation number: 1
>UUID: d1e512ee-d5b7-41f9-a0cc-1cc99b58f587
>LABEL:
>Set flags in SB:
> ATTRIBUTES CLEAN
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
>http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-26 9:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-25 15:30 Reiserfs Sloooow Boot Ricardo (Tru64 User)
2005-05-26 9:13 ` Edward Shishkin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.