From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Michael Thonke <iogl64nx@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Playing with SATA NCQ
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 10:09:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4299CD31.8020805@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4299BD23.6010004@gmail.com>
My basic hdparm timing test shouldn't show much of a difference
with NCQ tests, becase hdparm just does a single request at a time,
and waits for the results before issuing another. Now, kernel read-ahead
may result in some command overlap and a slight throughput increase, but..
Something like dbench and/or bonnie++ are more appropriate here.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-29 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-26 14:00 Playing with SATA NCQ Jens Axboe
2005-05-26 16:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-26 17:07 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-26 17:11 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-26 17:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-26 17:33 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-26 19:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-26 20:30 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:33 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:00 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 8:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-26 21:50 ` Mark Lord
2005-05-27 6:28 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 6:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:15 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 4:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 6:39 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 21:40 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-27 22:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 22:30 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-28 12:12 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 13:01 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 14:09 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2005-05-29 14:24 ` Tyler
2005-05-29 15:22 ` Eric D. Mudama
2005-05-29 19:04 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 19:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 19:21 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 19:03 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 20:12 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 20:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 6:05 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 6:07 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 18:10 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 19:06 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 16:03 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 16:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 16:50 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 16:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 17:23 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 17:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 17:45 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 18:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 18:10 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 18:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 18:27 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 18:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 16:57 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 17:26 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 0:06 ` Mark Lord
2005-05-30 7:29 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 18:09 ` Mark Lord
2005-05-30 18:22 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 18:25 ` Mark Lord
2005-05-30 18:34 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-30 18:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 18:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 18:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 20:03 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 20:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-31 7:44 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 23:14 ` Mark Lord
2005-05-31 7:48 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-31 8:05 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-05-29 21:49 ` Michael Thonke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4299CD31.8020805@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=iogl64nx@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.