From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SATA NCQ support
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:36:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4299EF74.9060506@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050529131611.GB13418@merlin.emma.line.org>
Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>
>>>suck and should not be cared about, and if I were to go into SATA, I
>>>should just get a new controller and forget about my onboard VIA crap.
>>>(I read newer VIA are supposed to support AHCI which is good.)
>>
>>SATA is still pretty fast without NCQ, it just makes some operations a
>
>
> Do I take this as SATA is faster than legacy ATA? In what respect?
> UDMA/33 and SATA I shouldn't be much different if I use the same drive,
> or is there something?
It is "likely" to be faster. Faster bus, newer technology.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-29 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-27 7:03 [PATCH] SATA NCQ support Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:30 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:47 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:56 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 8:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:35 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 8:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:42 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 23:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 13:18 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-27 13:53 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 14:46 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-27 14:58 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 13:16 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-29 16:36 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-05-30 2:35 ` Eric D. Mudama
2005-05-30 3:41 ` Greg Stark
2005-05-30 4:04 ` Eric D. Mudama
2005-05-30 6:21 ` Greg Stark
2005-05-30 6:33 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 12:16 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 12:37 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] <48Hix-88s-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <48N4N-4B5-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <48Pzt-6Kb-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-05-31 0:00 ` Robert Hancock
2005-05-31 1:21 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4299EF74.9060506@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.