All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	coywolf@lovecn.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] add execute in place support
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:03:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <429DC041.6070001@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050601133938.GB29116@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>

Jörn Engel wrote:

>On Wed, 1 June 2005 14:06:03 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>  
>
>>On Middeweken 01 Juni 2005 12:12, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>>As I'd like to aim for integration into -mm and vanilla later on,
>>>>I'd like to encourage everyone to give it a read and provide
>>>>feedback. All patches apply against git-head as of today.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I feel the name "execute in place" misleading. This is not the real
>>>XIP, IMHO. Invent another term or be tolerant?
>>>      
>>>
>>If this is not real execute in place, then what is? The term seems to
>>describe the patch rather well and we don't have this ability for Linux
>>applications anywhere else, at least not in official kernels.
>>    
>>
>
>We can execute the kernel in place, thanks to Nicolas Pitre.  For
>userspace I have seen to preparation patches, but nothing serious.
>  
>
Given that execute in place describes the ability to run code at
the very same location where it is permanently stored, and that
this is exactly what the patch enables, I think the wording is
correct.



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	coywolf@lovecn.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] add execute in place support
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:03:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <429DC041.6070001@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050601133938.GB29116@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>

Jörn Engel wrote:

>On Wed, 1 June 2005 14:06:03 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>  
>
>>On Middeweken 01 Juni 2005 12:12, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>>As I'd like to aim for integration into -mm and vanilla later on,
>>>>I'd like to encourage everyone to give it a read and provide
>>>>feedback. All patches apply against git-head as of today.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I feel the name "execute in place" misleading. This is not the real
>>>XIP, IMHO. Invent another term or be tolerant?
>>>      
>>>
>>If this is not real execute in place, then what is? The term seems to
>>describe the patch rather well and we don't have this ability for Linux
>>applications anywhere else, at least not in official kernels.
>>    
>>
>
>We can execute the kernel in place, thanks to Nicolas Pitre.  For
>userspace I have seen to preparation patches, but nothing serious.
>  
>
Given that execute in place describes the ability to run code at
the very same location where it is permanently stored, and that
this is exactly what the patch enables, I think the wording is
correct.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-01 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-11 14:29 [RFC/PATCH 0/5] add execute in place support Carsten Otte
2005-05-11 16:19 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-11 16:35   ` Carsten Otte
2005-05-12  8:57     ` Jörn Engel
2005-05-12  8:57       ` Jörn Engel
2005-05-12  9:10       ` Carsten Otte
2005-05-12  9:10         ` Carsten Otte
2005-05-12  9:43       ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-12  9:43         ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-01  9:33         ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-06-01  9:33           ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-06-01 11:31           ` Jörn Engel
2005-06-01 11:31             ` Jörn Engel
2005-06-01 10:12 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-06-01 12:06   ` Arnd Bergmann
2005-06-01 13:39     ` Jörn Engel
2005-06-01 13:39       ` Jörn Engel
2005-06-01 14:03       ` Carsten Otte [this message]
2005-06-01 14:03         ` Carsten Otte
2005-06-01 14:10         ` Jörn Engel
2005-06-01 14:10           ` Jörn Engel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=429DC041.6070001@de.ibm.com \
    --to=cotte@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cotte@freenet.de \
    --cc=coywolf@lovecn.org \
    --cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.