* [LARTC] Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
@ 2005-06-03 19:49 Radu CUGUT
2005-06-03 20:26 ` Daniel Lopes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Radu CUGUT @ 2005-06-03 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Daniel Lopes wrote:
> Ping a client you surely know should be connected to the switch. ARP
> will take the part to find out the hardware address so the packet can be
> delivered. If the switch is on it should find a hardware address and ARP
> should put it in your ARP cache. It´s independet from ICMP blocks and
> similar. So after trying to ping you should have an entry in your ARP
> table which you can control with "arp" command.
>
>
It seems that I didn't make myself quite clear ...
I want to know if there is a way to find out if a switch is working ok or not.
If there is something like a small device, that I plug into the
switch, ant then if that device "reports in" ok, then I know the
switch is working.
Like on a router... if you want to know if a router is doing it's job,
than you send an ICMP echo request to a host on the other side of the
router.
ME ----> ROUTER -----> testing host
well, I want the same thing but on an inferior layer, on a switch.
ME -----> SWITCH ----> testing device
I want to know if thare can be such thing as a "testing device".
I thought of an ethernet card, that i plug in the switch, power the
card up, and then somehot arping the card, from witch I know the MAC.
... but i don't think it works just like that :(.
Hope I was specific enough this time ....
Thanks for the (possible) answers.
Best regards,
Radu.
--
Radu Cugut
mobile: +40 742 045686
web: http://rcugut.has.it
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
2005-06-03 19:49 [LARTC] Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9 Radu CUGUT
@ 2005-06-03 20:26 ` Daniel Lopes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lopes @ 2005-06-03 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Radu CUGUT schrieb:
> Daniel Lopes wrote:
>
>>Ping a client you surely know should be connected to the switch. ARP
>>will take the part to find out the hardware address so the packet can be
>>delivered. If the switch is on it should find a hardware address and ARP
>>should put it in your ARP cache. It´s independet from ICMP blocks and
>>similar. So after trying to ping you should have an entry in your ARP
>>table which you can control with "arp" command.
>>
>>
>
>
> It seems that I didn't make myself quite clear ...
>
> I want to know if there is a way to find out if a switch is working ok or not.
>
It seems you can´t read. To ping someone you exactly know is connected
to the switch is the easiest way to get an arp cache entry. If you don´t
get an entry the switch is not working or the other one is blocking arp
what shouldn´t happen because he wouldn´t be able to receive any
packets. Just try what I said. Blocking protocols like ICMP doesn´t have
an impact on the work of arp respectively ethernet. Exactly spoken no
impact of getting the hardware address.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-03 20:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-03 19:49 [LARTC] Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9 Radu CUGUT
2005-06-03 20:26 ` Daniel Lopes
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.