Re: [LARTC] 2-3 uplinks, nat and failover...is it possible?

[gypsy <gypsy@iswest.com>]

aristo7514 aristo7514 wrote:

> I have a public IP block
> 81.8.124.1-81.8.124.63

and 172.17.whatever
as well as 172.18.whatever
and 81.8.120
:( ...  Why do you confuse us with just the one?

> Here is the list for my ip addresses.
> 
> eth0 has ip 172.16.55.1/255.255.255.0
> eth0:1 has ip 172.17.56.1/255.255.255.0
> eth0:2 has ip 172.17.57.1/255.255.255.0
> eth0:3 has ip 172.17.58.1/255.255.255.0
> eth0:4 has ip 81.8.124.1/255.255.255.192

I doubt that eth0:# is ever going to work because others have reported
failure to this ML under similar circumstances.
 
> eth1 has ip 81.8.120.18/255.255.255.252
> eth3 has ip 172.18.10.30/255.255.255.0
> 
> One of my internet connection is 81.8.120.18/255.255.255.252 with
> gateway of 81.8.120.17 (Public)
> 
> The other one is 172.18.10.30/255.255.255.0 with gateway of
> 172.18.10.2 (Behind an ADSL router)
 
Have you read Martin Brown's stuff at  http://linux-ip.net/ ?  If not,
you've missed (what I consider to be) the most understandable
documentation on the internet.

With Julian's patch, nano.txt and a reading of Martin you should be able
to use all the internet connections.  Dead Gateway Detection may not
work depending on the number of hops to the dead gateway.
--
gypsy
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc