* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
@ 2005-06-19 5:53 Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 9:23 ` Rudolf Marek
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ripp @ 2005-06-19 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Can anybody w/ a current kernel, an Asus PC-DL, and a working set of
sensors contact me off-list?
Sometime around kernel 2.6.9 my sensors stopped showing up and I can't
for the life of me get them back. sensors-detect appears to find them
but I get no devices in the /sys tree, nothing in dmesg, and nothing in
sensors. I just tried 2.6.12 in the vain hope they'd come back to me,
but nothing. Maybe we can fix it w/out polluting the list... TIA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
@ 2005-06-19 9:23 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 15:44 ` Chris Ripp
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rudolf Marek @ 2005-06-19 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi
Please send us output of sensors-detect.
Also can you visually confirm if you have W83792D on your motherboard?
Thanks
Regards
Rudolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 9:23 ` Rudolf Marek
@ 2005-06-19 15:44 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 17:56 ` Rudolf Marek
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ripp @ 2005-06-19 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Rudolf Marek wrote:
>Hi
>
>Please send us output of sensors-detect.
>
>Also can you visually confirm if you have W83792D on your motherboard?
>
>
>
[snip]
Output of sensors-detect attached. The machine is remotely located,
but I know for a fact there are sensors on this board as I've had them
working in the past... As can be seen here: (hey thats me! :] )
http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/readticket.cgi?ticket\x1630
System is running gentoo, and like I said, I can probe the modules and I
get nothing in dmesg ,/sys/, /proc/ or sensors output...
I appreciate it...
# sensors-detect
This program will help you determine which I2C/SMBus modules you need to
load to use lm_sensors most effectively. You need to have i2c and
lm_sensors installed before running this program.
Also, you need to be `root', or at least have access to the /dev/i2c/*
files, for most things.
If you have patched your kernel and have some drivers built in, you can
safely answer NO if asked to load some modules. In this case, things may
seem a bit confusing, but they will still work.
It is generally safe and recommended to accept the default answers to all
questions, unless you know what you're doing.
We can start with probing for (PCI) I2C or SMBus adapters.
You do not need any special privileges for this.
Do you want to probe now? (YES/no):
Probing for PCI bus adapters...
Use driver `i2c-matroxfb' for device 03:09.0: MGA 1064SG [Mystique]
Use driver `i2c-i801' for device 00:1f.3: Intel 82801EB ICH5
Probe succesfully concluded.
We will now try to load each adapter module in turn.
Load `i2c-matroxfb' (say NO if built into your kernel)? (YES/no):
FATAL: Module i2c_matroxfb not found.
Loading failed... skipping.
Load `i2c-i801' (say NO if built into your kernel)? (YES/no):
Module loaded succesfully.
If you have undetectable or unsupported adapters, you can have them
scanned by manually loading the modules before running this script.
To continue, we need module `i2c-dev' to be loaded.
If it is built-in into your kernel, you can safely skip this.
i2c-dev is not loaded. Do you want to load it now? (YES/no):
Module loaded succesfully.
We are now going to do the adapter probings. Some adapters may hang halfway
through; we can't really help that. Also, some chips will be double
detected;
we choose the one with the highest confidence value in that case.
If you found that the adapter hung after probing a certain address, you can
specify that address to remain unprobed. That often
includes address 0x69 (clock chip).
Next adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 0500
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
Client found at address 0x08
Client found at address 0x2f
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78-J'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM80'... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83781D'... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83782D'... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83791D'... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83792D'... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83791SD'... Success!
(confidence 3, driver `not-a-sensor')
Probing for `Winbond W83627HF'... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83627EHF'... Failed!
Probing for `Asus AS99127F (rev.1)'... Failed!
Probing for `Asus AS99127F (rev.2)'... Failed!
Probing for `Asus ASB100 Bach'... Failed!
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM9240'... Failed!
Probing for `Dallas Semiconductor DS1780'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM81'... Failed!
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1029'... Failed!
Probing for `ITE IT8712F'... Failed!
Probing for `ITE IT8705F / SiS 950'... Failed!
Client found at address 0x44
Probing for `Maxim MAX6633/MAX6634/MAX6635'... Failed!
Client found at address 0x48
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM75'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM77'... Failed!
Probing for `Dallas Semiconductor DS1621'... Failed!
Probing for `Maxim MAX6650/MAX6651'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM92'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM76'... Failed!
Probing for `Maxim MAX6633/MAX6634/MAX6635'... Failed!
Client found at address 0x49
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM75'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM77'... Failed!
Probing for `Dallas Semiconductor DS1621'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM92'... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM76'... Failed!
Probing for `Maxim MAX6633/MAX6634/MAX6635'... Failed!
Client found at address 0x50
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Success!
(confidence 8, driver `eeprom')
Probing for `DDC monitor'... Failed!
Probing for `Maxim MAX6900'... Failed!
Client found at address 0x51
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Success!
(confidence 8, driver `eeprom')
Client found at address 0x52
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Success!
(confidence 8, driver `eeprom')
Client found at address 0x61
Probing for `SMBus 2.0 ARP-Capable Device'... Success!
(confidence 1, driver `smbus-arp')
Client found at address 0x69
Some chips are also accessible through the ISA bus. ISA probes are
typically a bit more dangerous, as we have to write to I/O ports to do
this. This is usually safe though.
Do you want to scan the ISA bus? (YES/no):
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78-J'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83781D'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83782D'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83627HF'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83627EHF'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83697HF'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595'
Trying general detect... Failed!
Probing for `VIA Technologies VT82C686 Integrated Sensors'
Trying general detect... Failed!
Probing for `VIA Technologies VT8231 Integrated Sensors'
Trying general detect... Failed!
Probing for `ITE IT8712F'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `ITE IT8705F / SiS 950'
Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS'
Trying address 0x0ca0... Failed!
Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC'
Trying address 0x0ca8... Failed!
Some Super I/O chips may also contain sensors. Super I/O probes are
typically a bit more dangerous, as we have to write to I/O ports to do
this. This is usually safe though.
Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
Probing for `ITE 8702F Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (0x8282)
Probing for `ITE 8705F Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (0x8282)
Probing for `ITE 8712F Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (0x8282)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87351 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87360 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87363 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87364 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87365 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87365 Super IO Voltage Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87365 Super IO Thermal Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87366 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87366 Super IO Voltage Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87366 Super IO Thermal Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87372 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87373 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87591 Super IO'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87371 Super IO'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC97371 Super IO'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC8739x Super IO'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC8741x Super IO'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `SMSC 47B27x Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `SMSC 47M10x/13x Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `SMSC 47M14x Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `SMSC 47M15x/192 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `SMSC 47S42x Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `SMSC 47S45x Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `SMSC 47M172 Super IO'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `SMSC LPC47B397-NC Super IO'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `VT1211 Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Winbond W83627HF Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Winbond W83627THF Super IO Sensors'
Success... found at address 0x0290
Probing for `Winbond W83637HF Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Winbond W83697HF Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Winbond W83697SF/UF Super IO PWM'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Winbond W83L517D Super IO'
Failed! (0x82)
Probing for `Winbond W83627EHF Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (0x8282)
Do you want to scan for secondary Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
Probing for `ITE 8702F Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (skipping family)
Probing for `Nat. Semi. PC87351 Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (skipping family)
Probing for `SMSC 47B27x Super IO Fan Sensors'
Failed! (skipping family)
Probing for `VT1211 Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (skipping family)
Probing for `Winbond W83627EHF Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (skipping family)
Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
Just press ENTER to continue:
Driver `not-a-sensor' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0500'
Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x2f
Chip `Winbond W83791SD' (confidence: 3)
Driver `eeprom' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0500'
Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x50
Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
* Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0500'
Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x51
Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
* Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0500'
Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x52
Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8)
Driver `smbus-arp' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0500'
Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x61
Chip `SMBus 2.0 ARP-Capable Device' (confidence: 1)
Driver `w83627hf' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* ISA bus address 0x0290 (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
Chip `Winbond W83627THF Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
I will now generate the commands needed to load the I2C modules.
Sometimes, a chip is available both through the ISA bus and an I2C bus.
ISA bus access is faster, but you need to load an additional driver module
for it. If you have the choice, do you want to use the ISA bus or the
I2C/SMBus (ISA/smbus)?
To make the sensors modules behave correctly, add these lines to
/etc/modules.conf:
#----cut here----
# I2C module options
alias char-major-89 i2c-dev
#----cut here----
To load everything that is needed, add this to some /etc/rc* file:
#----cut here----
# I2C adapter drivers
modprobe i2c-i801
modprobe i2c-isa
# I2C chip drivers
modprobe eeprom
# Warning: the required module smbus-arp is not currently installed on
your system.
# For status of 2.6 kernel ports see
http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/supported.html
# If driver is built-in to the kernel, or unavailable, comment out the
following line.
modprobe smbus-arp
modprobe w83627hf
# sleep 2 # optional
/usr/local/bin/sensors -s # recommended
#----cut here----
WARNING! If you have some things built into your kernel, the list above
will contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones! You really should
try these commands right now to make sure everything is working properly.
Monitoring programs won't work until it's done.
Do you want to generate /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (YES/no):
Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/rc.d/init.d/lm_sensors
for initialization at boot time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 9:23 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 15:44 ` Chris Ripp
@ 2005-06-19 17:56 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 18:23 ` Chris Ripp
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rudolf Marek @ 2005-06-19 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi,
We are suspecting that you have enabled in kernel ACPI PNP stuff. Please disable it pernamently or try
pnpacpi=off
as kernel parameter. (the parameter will work for 2.6.11 or 2.6.12)
If it works and you can read sensors I will advise more how to get CPU temps directly from CPU...
Regards
Rudolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-19 17:56 ` Rudolf Marek
@ 2005-06-19 18:23 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 19:51 ` Rudolf Marek
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ripp @ 2005-06-19 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Rudolf Marek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We are suspecting that you have enabled in kernel ACPI PNP stuff. Please disable it pernamently or try
>pnpacpi=off
>
>as kernel parameter. (the parameter will work for 2.6.11 or 2.6.12)
>If it works and you can read sensors I will advise more how to get CPU temps directly from CPU...
>
>Regards
>Rudolf
>
>
ha! That figures. Not sure when that pnpacpi option was added or when I
turned it on, but that was the cure. Brilliant!
w83627thf-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
VCore: +1.47 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.87 V)
+12V: +11.92 V (min = +3.16 V, max = +3.89 V) ALARM
+3.3V: +3.26 V (min = +0.13 V, max = +0.03 V) ALARM
+5V: +4.91 V (min = +3.63 V, max = +3.44 V) ALARM
-12V: -14.91 V (min = -14.91 V, max = -14.91 V) ALARM
V5SB: +5.05 V (min = +0.11 V, max = +0.03 V) ALARM
VBat: +3.10 V (min = +2.83 V, max = +0.26 V) ALARM
fan1: 3750 RPM (min = 3125 RPM, div = 2)
CPU Fan: 5487 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2) ALARM
fan3: 5532 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 2) ALARM
M/B Temp: +46 C (high = +0 C, hyst = +0 C) sensor thermistor ALARM
CPU Temp: +41.5 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = thermistor
temp3: +39.0 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = thermistor
vid: +0.275 V (VRM Version 9.0)
alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM
beep_enable:
Sound alarm disabled
I think I can figure out the labels etc. from here, unless you're
talking about something else w/ the CPU temps?
Thanks again!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-19 18:23 ` Chris Ripp
@ 2005-06-19 19:51 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 22:15 ` Chris Ripp
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rudolf Marek @ 2005-06-19 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> ha! That figures. Not sure when that pnpacpi option was added or when I
> turned it on, but that was the cure. Brilliant!
The 0x290 IO port was reserved by ACPI and our driver failed to register it.
You turned off the ACPI PNP feature with that option.
> w83627thf-isa-0290
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> VCore: +1.47 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.87 V)
> +12V: +11.92 V (min = +3.16 V, max = +3.89 V) ALARM
> +3.3V: +3.26 V (min = +0.13 V, max = +0.03 V) ALARM
> +5V: +4.91 V (min = +3.63 V, max = +3.44 V) ALARM
> -12V: -14.91 V (min = -14.91 V, max = -14.91 V) ALARM
> V5SB: +5.05 V (min = +0.11 V, max = +0.03 V) ALARM
> VBat: +3.10 V (min = +2.83 V, max = +0.26 V) ALARM
> fan1: 3750 RPM (min = 3125 RPM, div = 2)
> CPU Fan: 5487 RPM (min = -1 RPM, div = 2) ALARM
> fan3: 5532 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 2) ALARM
> M/B Temp: +46 C (high = +0 C, hyst = +0 C) sensor > thermistor ALARM
> CPU Temp: +41.5 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = thermistor
> temp3: +39.0 C (high = +80 C, hyst = +75 C) sensor = thermistor
> vid: +0.275 V (VRM Version 9.0)
> alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM
> beep_enable:
> Sound alarm disabled
>
> I think I can figure out the labels etc. from here, unless you're
> talking about something else w/ the CPU temps?
We just sent a query about THF chip to winbond we think it might have some additional features. (more fans)
The CPUs itself might have build in sensor. I think it resides on address 0x48 and 0x49
Please can you do:
modprobe i2c-i801
modprobe i2c-dev
i2cdump 0 0x48
i2cdump 0 0x49
In meanwhile you can try:
modprobe adm1021 force_adm1021=0,0x48
Or better (i'm not sure about delimiter)
modprobe adm1021 force_adm1021=0,0x48,0,0x49
sensors
More on this on monday after my exam.
Regards
Rudolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-19 19:51 ` Rudolf Marek
@ 2005-06-19 22:15 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 22:50 ` Rudolf Marek
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ripp @ 2005-06-19 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
[snip]
>We just sent a query about THF chip to winbond we think it might have some additional features. (more fans)
>
>The CPUs itself might have build in sensor. I think it resides on address 0x48 and 0x49
>
>Please can you do:
>
>modprobe i2c-i801
>modprobe i2c-dev
>i2cdump 0 0x48
>i2cdump 0 0x49
>
>
>
able ~ # i2cdump 0 0x48
No size specified (using byte-data access)
WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and worse!
I will probe file /dev/i2c/0, address 0x48, mode byte
Continue? [Y/n]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef
00: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
10: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
20: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
30: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
40: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
50: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
60: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
70: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
80: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
90: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
a0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
b0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
c0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
d0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
e0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
f0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
able ~ # i2cdump 0 0x49
No size specified (using byte-data access)
WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and worse!
I will probe file /dev/i2c/0, address 0x49, mode byte
Continue? [Y/n]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef
00: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
10: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
20: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
30: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
40: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
50: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
60: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
70: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
80: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
90: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
a0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
b0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
c0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
d0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
e0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
f0: 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 7c 00 4b 50 |.KP|.KP|.KP|.KP
I will have to recompile for this, and can't do it right now, when I get
there I'll reply about this section...
>In meanwhile you can try:
>
>modprobe adm1021 force_adm1021=0,0x48
>Or better (i'm not sure about delimiter)
>modprobe adm1021 force_adm1021=0,0x48,0,0x49
>sensors
>
>More on this on monday after my exam.
>
>Regards
>Rudolf
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-19 22:15 ` Chris Ripp
@ 2005-06-19 22:50 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 23:06 ` Chris Ripp
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rudolf Marek @ 2005-06-19 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> able ~ # i2cdump 0 0x48
Have you also Kryten ?
> I will have to recompile for this, and can't do it right now, when I get
> there I'll reply about this section...
Hmm it seems like lm75 compatible chip
Please prepare lm75 driver too.
To have all data do our puzzle, I would like to ask you also for:
i2cdump 0 0x2f
Thanks
regards
Rudolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-19 22:50 ` Rudolf Marek
@ 2005-06-19 23:06 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 23:17 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-20 15:26 ` Jean Delvare
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ripp @ 2005-06-19 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Rudolf Marek wrote:
>>able ~ # i2cdump 0 0x48
>>
>>
>
>Have you also Kryten ?
>
>
>
>>I will have to recompile for this, and can't do it right now, when I get
>>there I'll reply about this section...
>>
>>
>
>Hmm it seems like lm75 compatible chip
>Please prepare lm75 driver too.
>
>To have all data do our puzzle, I would like to ask you also for:
>
>i2cdump 0 0x2f
>
>
>
able ~ # i2cdump 0 0x2f
No size specified (using byte-data access)
WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and worse!
I will probe file /dev/i2c/0, address 0x2f, mode byte
Continue? [Y/n]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef
00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8a 00 00 01 00 00 ff .........?..?...
10: 00 00 7f 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc ..?..?.........?
20: 1d 09 1a bc 09 09 09 7c ff ff ff 7e 68 00 00 ed ???????|...~h..?
30: b0 00 08 10 10 20 10 58 b5 00 20 00 00 20 ff ff ?.??? ?X?. .. ..
40: 01 ff 2f 00 00 00 00 50 2f 10 01 44 01 95 80 5c ?./....P/??D???\
50: ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 80 72 70 ff 00 00 00 05 ff .......?rp....?.
60: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
70: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
80: 01 ff 01 ff 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 3c 3c 0a 0a ?.?.....????<<??
90: 00 00 00 01 ff 00 00 00 01 01 3c 18 00 00 01 01 ...?....??<?..??
a0: ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 1a ff 2f 18 00 ff ff ff ........?./?....
b0: bb 04 09 ff 40 00 00 40 20 00 ff ff 1b 01 ff ff ???.@..@ ...??..
c0: 7c 00 00 4b 00 50 00 ff 7c 00 00 4b 00 50 00 ff |..K.P..|..K.P..
d0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
e0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
f0: ff ff 00 ff 00 01 00 ff ff 02 ff 00 00 07 ff 1d .....?...?...?.?
able ~ #
sensors-detect has claimed to have found an lm75 before, but I never
could get anything out of that, I just figured it was a false positive....
I will let you know what happens when I can get around to recompiling
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-19 23:06 ` Chris Ripp
@ 2005-06-19 23:17 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-20 15:26 ` Jean Delvare
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ripp @ 2005-06-19 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Rudolf Marek wrote:
>>able ~ # i2cdump 0 0x48
>>
>>
>
>Have you also Kryten ?
>
>
Forgot to ask, what do you mean 'Kryten'?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-06-19 23:17 ` Chris Ripp
@ 2005-06-20 15:26 ` Jean Delvare
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2005-06-20 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi all,
Rudolf Marek wrote:
> We just sent a query about THF chip to winbond we think it might have
> some additional features. (more fans)
You're mixing two different things here. The datasheet I queried Winbond
for is for the W826_8_7THF chip, not for the W836_2_7THF chip. I do not
think there is any (important) feature in the W83627THF that we don't
support.
> In meanwhile you can try:
>
> modprobe adm1021 force_adm1021=0,0x48
> Or better (i'm not sure about delimiter)
> modprobe adm1021 force_adm1021=0,0x48,0,0x49
> sensors
I wouldn't do that. Seeing the dumps, these chips are clearly not
ADM1021-like, and forcing the adm1021 driver may cause trouble. At the
very least, use the read_only parameter of the adm1021 driver. But I'm
pretty sure it won't help anyway. The chips are more likely LM75 or
LM77 compatible. Maybe the Xeon docs from Intel mention it?
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-20 15:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-19 5:53 [lm-sensors] Req for sensors help w/ Asus PC-DL Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 9:23 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 15:44 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 17:56 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 18:23 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 19:51 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 22:15 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 22:50 ` Rudolf Marek
2005-06-19 23:06 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-19 23:17 ` Chris Ripp
2005-06-20 15:26 ` Jean Delvare
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.