From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kill the fake conntrack
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:29:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42BD5C41.2080505@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42BD5829.4030002@eurodev.net>
Pablo Neira wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> What is the advantage of this patch?
>
> Whenever we work with conntracks, we always have to check if it's the
> fake or not previously. For example, a bad use of NOTRACK together with
> other targets, say ipt_CONNMARK, that doesn't currently check if it's
> working with the fake conntrack or not. Same thing for NAT handlings, I
> see that this can result in weirdness.
>
> Setting nfct to NULL will make NAT targets, conntrack helpers and
> friends just ignore untracked packets, so we could forget about making
> sure that we aren't messing with the fake conntrack.
Sounds reasonable - but couldn't we simply change ip_conntrack_get
to return NULL for untracked connections?
>> Its changing the assumption
>> that skb->nfctinfo is only valid if skb->nfct is set, so you probably
>> need to set nfctinfo to 0 in nf_reset as well. This alone is a reason
>> not to do it IMO.
>
> why need to set nfctinfo to 0 in nf_reset? since skb->nfct is NULL
> nf_reset shouldn't be ever called. With the logic I'm proposing, this
> packet will be handle just like invalid ones, so it will be just ignored.
nf_reset is called independant of the contents of skb->nfct. nfctinfo
needs to be set to 0 so a packet isn't untracked afterwards anymore.
Think of tunnel devices.
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-25 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-25 12:42 [RFC][PATCH] kill the fake conntrack Pablo Neira
2005-06-25 12:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-25 13:12 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-25 13:20 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-25 13:29 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-06-25 18:47 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-25 19:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-28 12:05 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42BD5C41.2080505@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=pablo@eurodev.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.