* Light weight shadow code
@ 2005-06-25 20:42 Arun Sharma
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arun Sharma @ 2005-06-25 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xen-devel
We're doing some changes to the shadow code and would like to make sure
that we're not breaking existing functionality - specifically support
for the light weight shadows.
Can someone tell us if this code is functional? If yes, how do we go
about testing it?
-Arun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: Light weight shadow code
@ 2005-06-26 7:22 Ian Pratt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pratt @ 2005-06-26 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arun Sharma, Xen-devel
> We're doing some changes to the shadow code and would like to
> make sure that we're not breaking existing functionality -
> specifically support for the light weight shadows.
> Can someone tell us if this code is functional?
Yes it is, and its critical migration and hence has to be rock solid
stable.
> If yes, how do we go about testing it?
Use the dom0_op interface to turn it on (specifically LOGDIRTY mode),
then in the background call the CLEAN command every couple of seconds.
You should then run at least lmbench, ltp, fork bomb, ttcp, dd, kernel
compile over NFS.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-26 7:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-25 20:42 Light weight shadow code Arun Sharma
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-26 7:22 Ian Pratt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.